A judge told a 79-year-old former Tasmanian man who sexually assaulted two generations of his own family a very lengthy jail sentence was inevitable for his latest crimes.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
$0/
(min cost $0)
or signup to continue reading
Justice Robert Pearce made his remark after the man pleaded guilty to persistent sexual abuse of a child between 1977 and 1985.
The court heard the man's daughter was aged between eight and 16 years old when he raped and sexually assaulted her between 50 and 100 times.
The victim, a number of family members, and other supporters attended the plea hearing in the Supreme Court in Launceston.
Crown prosecutor John Ransom told the court that in 2019, the man had been convicted and jailed for indecently assaulting his granddaughter.
He was released in 2023.
Mr Ransom said the family moved from Victoria to the George Town area in 1977. He said the complainant could remember four places where sexual assault had occurred.
At least twice a week, she had been required to touch and perform oral sex on her father.
Mr Ransom told the court that the complainant could vividly remember being told to watch a pornographic video, and he wanted her to re-enact a scene from the video.
"He held her long hair like reins," Mr Ransom said.
The act comprised a count of vaginal rape. There were several counts of rape comprising penetration with vegetables.
"The complainant recalls feeling it was not right and said that no condom was used," he said.
Mr Ransom read a victim impact statement to the court on behalf of the now 54-year-old woman.
"My father violated and betrayed me and stole my childhood innocence," the statement said.
"A daughter needs a father to show her how to behave ... but this was all based on lies and abuse."
The effects had been devastating, profound, and far-reaching for the rest of her life.
The victim's impact statement said that the abuse meant she was never able to realise her goal of becoming a mother.
Defence lawyer Lucy Flanagan said the man had operated a business during his working life.
She conceded that sentences for the particular type of crime had increased in recent years.
"It could mean he is never released again and may not even reach a parole date," Ms Flanagan said.
Justice Pearce told the man that he would inevitably receive a very lengthy sentence.
He remanded him in custody, prompting a cry of "hallelujah" from a spectator, to reappear for sentence on May 9.