Lake Malbena proponent says Parks and Wildlife flight report disproves wilderness impact, opponent disagrees

Adam Holmes
June 22 2021 - 3:30am
Flight paths mapped by Parks and Wildlife (orange = 40-50 hours per year, red = 250-300 hours), including the proposed Lake Malbena flight path heading north from Derwent Bridge. Image: Parks and Wildlife
Flight paths mapped by Parks and Wildlife (orange = 40-50 hours per year, red = 250-300 hours), including the proposed Lake Malbena flight path heading north from Derwent Bridge. Image: Parks and Wildlife

The proponent of the Lake Malbena tourism proposal says a Parks and Wildlife report mapping tourism-based flights over Tasmania's wilderness areas shows that his venture would have minimal impact on wilderness values.

Subscribe now for unlimited access.

$0/

(min cost $0)

or signup to continue reading

See subscription options
Adam Holmes

Adam Holmes

Journalist at The Examiner and Advocate, Tasmania

From Adelaide to south-west Victoria, Bendigo to Tasmania, I've provided in-depth stories in politics, environmental affairs, issues facing disadvantaged communities, legal affairs and much more. Contact me at adam.holmes@examiner.com.au or on Twitter at @adamholmes010

Get the latest Launceston news in your inbox

Sign up for our newsletter to stay up to date.

We care about the protection of your data. Read our Privacy Policy.