So here we are, 14 months from the day Australian women poured onto the streets across Australia and what's called a women's issue is barely making headlines.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
$0/
(min cost $0)
or signup to continue reading
Both parties have been asked by a number of organisations to show up for debates across a variety of areas and the answer is always, as that great Australian statesman Tony Abbott once said, nope, nope, nope. Laura Tingle, president of the National Press Club, put it plainly: "The Press Club is a platform for national debates. We've invited the major parties to take part in debates on health, foreign policy, aged care, women and climate change. We have not been able to get the parties to agree on those debates."
I understand the ALP's shadow minister for women Tanya Plibersek was up for a debate. But as has been the case for the entirety of its term of government, the Coalition will not show up for women. Not now. Not ever. The folks at the NPC tell me so.
So, should I try to imagine a fantasy debate between the Minister for Women Marise Payne and shadow minister Plibersek? Ooooooh, hold on. It can't be Payne. She has barely said a single word about her portfolio since the day she got it.
After that, it's a tough call to choose. Should we request Amanda Stoker, the assistant minister for women? See that's tough. On any measure, she is the least appropriate choice. She's the one who attended an anti-choice rally last weekend when the vast majority of Australians support the right to for safe, legal abortions. So maybe Anne Ruston, Michaelia Cash, Karen Andrews, Linda Reynolds, Sussan Ley or Melissa Price? I dunno. The list of women's ministers - or those on some kind of super-dooper taskforce - in this government is so long yet so absent from the national discussions on what we need.
Where were those politicians when the Prime Minister refused to face women who showed up at Parliament House last March and instead said that women were lucky not to have been met with bullets? Yeah, yeah, some were in the crowd but when you have power you should wield it for good. Fine to turn up to a rally but anyone can do that - not everyone can work for legislative change.
Last year, I wrote women had nothing to celebrate but their rage. I still believe that. We have achieved next to nothing since that astonishing day when I honestly believed our united enragement would shift the public consciousness. Now, we have to wield our political engagement to get what we want (and no, I don't have faith Labor will instantly magic a utopia for women but at least it's working on key issues as are the Greens. I don't see any evidence of that among either the Liberal Party or the Nationals).
Women do not want to be babied or cajoled, ignored or bullied. They want respect, they want to be safe, they want to be paid what they are worth, they want to be safe at work, they want excellent care for their children. And behind every woman voter is a man who should now recognise he must vote in the best interests of his partner and his family. Or reap what he sows.
MORE JENNA PRICE:
So, let me give you some federal election benchmarks created by the Work + Family Roundtable, a group of eminent researchers from across Australia, led by Elizabeth Hill, associate professor at the University of Sydney and Sara Charlesworth, professor at RMIT University. This is what women need.
- Decent work - at its most basic, fair pay for secure work and genuine respect for those who work in feminised industries. Who cares for your kids and your parents? Who cares for those with a disability. Women's care keeps our society together and must be recognised for that.
- High quality care infrastructure for decent work and a sustainable workforce - make those care industries sustainable. OH MY GOD I AM A NEWISH GRANDMA AND WE STILL HAVE THE SAME HOPELESS MAYHEM AS WHEN MY KIDS WERE BABIES LAST CENTURY. Provide much more support for childcare. I love the ideas of Samantha Page, the CEO of Early Childhood Australia, who says what we really need is a vision for the early years that balances parents needs and children's needs, extended paid parental leave which allows parents to stay at home and bond with their newborns, high quality early education for all children regardless of their parent's workforce participation.
- Gender pay equality. Obviously. Make it an explicit objective of the Fair Work Act 2009. Get the blokes who sit behind desks all day to spend a few days in a childcare centre and see how they go (OK, the Work+Family Roundtable did not suggest this but seriously, what could go wrong?)
- Safe and respectful workplaces - get ourselves a government which understands why we need to implement all the remaining recommendations of the Sex Discrimination Commissioner's Respect@Work report, especially the bit which says employers should have a positive duty to make workplaces safe. Why has that been so hard for the government when we have an epidemic of sexual harassment at work?
- My absolute favourite benchmark because it will underpin everything else - Institutional support for decent work and decent care, a well-resourced national gender equality policy and a national Agency for Work, Care and Community to make sure we develop a social contract where everyone has the right to all of the above. Champion. But probs also a bit scary for some of the blokes who currently run the show.
I asked Samantha Page from ECA if any party had it right. She said the Greens have the best policy platform because it puts children at the centre and the ALP policy is a substantial investment and will address affordability for families. She says the "cheaper childcare" line frustrates "people in the sector who want to be acknowledged as educators and teachers".
The Coalition is not up for a debate but you can have one at your own kitchen table. Ask yourself which party will best support you and your family the way you want to live your life. When you are sure, get back to me.
- Jenna Price is a regular columnist and a visiting fellow at the Australian National University.