News 
 Local News 
 News 
 Politics 
 ALP conference supports gays marriage 

ALP conference supports gays marriage

27 Jul, 2009 10:25 AM
THE Tasmanian ALP annual conference in Hobart has resoundingly supported same-sex marriage.

Gay law reform advocates have welcomed the move and expect the issue to be debated at this week's ALP national conference.

The state conference motion from Young Labor yesterday was supported by about two-thirds of the delegates.

The motion calls for the Federal Government to reform the Marriage Act to allow same-sex couples the right to marry.

Australian Young Labor president Stuart Benson yesterday noted that the Rudd Government had already recognised same-sex de facto couples, but said more was required to ensure equality.

"We believe a couple is a couple and marriage rights enjoyed by heterosexual couples should be afforded to all couples," Mr Benson said.

Labor Senator Helen Polley spoke against the motion.

She said the Federal Government had gone far enough in economically supporting those in same-sex relationships.

Senator Polley said same- sex marriage "is not an issue in the community any more than what it was 10 years ago".

But Tasmanian Gay and Lesbian Rights Group spokesman Rodney Croome said 80 per cent of same-sex couples supported same-sex marriage.

Mr Croome said it was the first time a state branch of the Labor Party had passed a vote for same-sex marriage.

"It is a really important step forward. Up until now both major parties have uniformly opposed same-sex marriage," Mr Croome said.

Mr Croome expected the issue to be debated at the end of the ALP national conference in Sydney on Thursday.

The Financial Review and Sydney Morning Herald last week reported cross-factional group Rainbow Labor had been lobbying national conference delegates to support gay marriage or civil unions.

Nationally, the ALP supports state-based civil unions - which have been performed in Tasmania since 2004 - but opposes same-sex marriage.

"The decision today in Hobart will send a very strong message to the national conference that it needs to seriously debate the issue and it sends a strong message to Kevin Rudd that he's out of step with not only community opinion but opinion within his own party," Mr Croome said.

ALP state secretary John Dowling said same-sex marriage was not on the national ALP conference agenda but could be debated if a delegate sought to amend the national platform.

Although same-sex marriage reform was resoundingly supported yesterday, Mr Dowling said Tasmanian delegates to the national ALP conference were not bound by the vote.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Mr. Benson's belief that marriage rights enjoyed by heterosexuals should be afforded to all couples ( Examiner 27th July ), seems to be at odds with Nature's wisdom in providing two sexes for the natural preservation of the various species. In the case of humans, this has traditionally been achieved by the mating of male and female in a loving marriage, although wedlock in every case has not been a prerequisite. The use of the term "marriage" in any other form for humans does not seem appropriate. Mr. Croome , in the same article, stated that 80% of same -sex couples supported same -sex marriage - in other words 20% did not. Is there a message there?
Posted by Borani, 27/07/2009 5:11:35 PM, on The Examiner
What a lot of old codswallop has the trendy left in the ALP have tried to sell us. They have chosen to go the easy way of 'non-discrimination' rather than the right way which requires a bit of thinking. Every australian man and every australian woman are protected under the law to have equal rights and equal treatment under the law. This business being put around by the likes of the old whiner Rodney Croome that homosexuals don't have equal rights is a complete nonsense. A gay man has the same rights as a straight man. In respect of marriage, that means that the man has the right to marry any willing woman, but only one at a time and not one that he is related to.... There is no law requiring a person to marry so it's not as if gays are being snubbed. Marriage is between a man and a woman, voluntarily entered into for life. its a shame that more in the labour party don't think that marriage is something worth protecting. However, congratulations to Helen Polley who seems to be in the minority of sense. James.
Posted by James D, 27/07/2009 6:33:25 PM, on The Examiner
I find James comments interesting in that they don't acknowledge the seemingly simple differentiating factor of homosexuals; that homosexuals are attracted to members of the same sex, not to members of the opposite. However, I agree with him to some level - it is perfectly true that a homosexual male has the right to marry a woman if he so chooses. So does a straight man. But, even though a heterosexual male may not want to get married, the options available to him are applicable to his life and his preferences. The options available to LGBT people are useless to them. In the Toonen vs Australia case of the 1990's, a law forbidding homosexual sex in Tasmania was abolished, having found to have been in breach of other anti-discriminatory laws. In the Young v Australia case also, the government were found to be in breach of anti-discrimination laws by failing to provide a pension for same sex partner of a deceased war veteran. This law has still not been changed, amended or abolished. "A gay man has the same rights as a straight man" - James D. If this is your perception already, then why does it pose such a problem to enforce it by law?
Posted by Alanna, 31/07/2009 10:58:12 PM, on The Examiner
Please consider the following FACTS, -to put children first and to not be driven by ‘my rights’ rhetoric and selfish desire. Marriage is best for society. Heterosexual married relationships still provide the best foundation and environment in which to raise children and promote a healthy society. Heterosexual, committed, marriage relationships are healthy for the individuals, for children and for society. Even today, less than 1.5% of all heterosexual marriage relationships break down in Australia each year. No previous society in the history of mankind has ever normalised homosexual relationships. The science has not changed: There is NO evidence, scientific or social, that homosexuality is genetic, innate, or unchangeable. La Trobe university ‘Sex in Australia’ survey states that just 1.2% of adult Australians identify as homosexual. Large surveys in many Western countries support this data. Australians have left homosexuality and now lead happy heterosexual lives. There is plenty of evidence that homosexual relationships are not biologically or anatomically natural: Two men or two women cannot have a natural sexual relationship.
Posted by Please uphold the institution of marriage as a union between a man and a woman., 31/07/2009 11:48:39 PM, on The Examiner
Men cannot be mothers, and women cannot be fathers, and children need one of each. There is plenty of evidence that homosexual relationships are not healthy for the individual, for children or for society: Rates of syphilis, gonorrhoea and Chlamydia are much higher among homosexuals than in the general community. Around 80% of all HIV/AIDS in Australia is associated with homosexual sex. Homosexual relationships are rarely monogamous and many are promiscuous and short term. HPV is extremely prevalent in the homosexual community. FINALLY, if we normalise and legitimise same-sex relationships based simply on some notion of ‘love’ or ‘human rights’ then why not normalise and legitimise multi-partner relationships such as two, three, or even four women and a man, or three men and two women, if they 'love' each other. Are not their so- called ‘human rights’ also important? Then we must ask ... just how far do we go? Rights and benefits should not be given based on some simple definition of ‘love’ or on ‘rights’ but on what is good, healthy and beneficial for the whole community and for the most vulnerable, our children. Anything less is irresponsible idealism.
Posted by Please uphold the institution of marriage as a union between a man and a woman., 31/07/2009 11:58:20 PM, on The Examiner

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


Download The Examiner iPhone App


The Examiner Newspaper







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...