A voluntary assisted dying advocate is confident the House of Assembly will be able to vote on the final bill this coming week, believing few amendments will be needed in light of an independent review of the laws.
The debate will be the first order of business when Parliament resumes.
A University of Tasmania review described the Tasmanian laws as "providing for one of the 'safest' VAD regimes in the world", finding there were six points of difference with laws in three other Australian jurisdictions.
The Tasmanian bill differs from others in that it allows medical practitioners to initiate the conversation with patients, it allows for four administration options, the person must make three separate requests for VAD and there's a shorter waiting time between requests.
IN OTHER NEWS:
The government last week released departmental advice on the laws along with the review, finding there were 73 potential "issues".
Dying with Dignity Tasmania president Hilde Nilsson said any changes to the bill would only be minor.
"Few if any minor amendments are needed, and they are to make access to VAD fairer for people with intolerable suffering who choose VAD and better for doctors and other health practitioners to do their jobs in helping people achieve their end of life choice," she said.
"DwDTas is confident that House of Assembly MPs are as capable as legislative councillors in assessing proposed amendments and taking a final vote on the Bill next week."
Since the release of the review, several government MPs have spoken of their concerns at the bill using official government media releases.
Attorney-General Elise Archer said the government's advice "raises a fundamental legal flaw" in regards to telehealth, and she had concerns for other ways it interacted with Tasmanian law.
Leader of the House Michael Ferguson said the advice "raises more questions than answers".
"Many people will be surprised to find how a bill so problematic was ever described as safe and strong," he said.
The only press releases issued by the government since last week have either been neutral or questioning of the laws.
Health Minister Sarah Courtney said she believed the debate in Parliament would be conducted in "an attitude of mutual respect".
"This is an incredibly important topic. I understand that there are a divergent range of views and very deeply held convictions on this issue," she said.
"However, I'm sure that we will be able to conduct the debate in a way that's appropriate and ultimately, should this legislation pass, have a legislation that is as robust as possible to protect Tasmanians."