Who to Choose
WHO do you trust, a team of egotists hungering for leadership? Or a doubtful man of integrity in a party controlled by unions?
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
$0/
(min cost $0)
or signup to continue reading
One has shown no ability to handle the economy on the big stage, or one who has failed to handle the cost of living.
One who has stop the boats and illegal entry, or one who wants to open Australia boarders to all.
I cannot wear Dutton and I have little respect for Shorten with good reasons, but I am warming to Scott Morrison.
He is showing good trustworthy leadership with the ability to rectify Australia's economy and create jobs.
Unfortunately failing pensioners and lower income strugglers, by not controlling the cost of living.
Voters are controlled by ease of living
You're choice the Liberal coalition full of egotists, or a party controlled a faceless caucus and unions, hell bent on economic chaos.
Peter Doddy, Trevallyn.
Labor v Coalition
FROM a big picture view there are at least two major ways the Shorten Labor Party is superior to the Morrison Coalition.
One is the policy of the Labor Party to act strongly on climate change.
Labor has been pressing for strong targets for at least five years.
The other major way Labor is superior is its drive to strengthen equality in Australian society.
In handicapping the wealthy from creating more wealth for themselves, and in sharing the wealth with the average person in society, they are keeping Australia a more equal society.
Our democratic way of life depends on equality.
When groups in our society become too wealthy and powerful the average person loses his/her power and rights.
However despite these encouraging directions we need to be aware that Labor still is prepared to play politics over being humane.
Before Kerryn Phelps introduced her Medivac bill to parliament the Labor party was lock, stock and barrel in line with the coalition on the treatment of asylum seekers.
Like the coalition they were prepared to play politics and allow the suffering of others.
We need a change of government but we need to be clear-eyed about the nature of a future Shorten Government.