News 
 Local News 
 News 
 Politics 
 Same-sex marriage vote on hold 

Same-sex marriage vote on hold

05 Feb, 2012 03:00 AM
THE gay marriage debate in Parliament will be pushed back to later in the year to give advocates for change more time to garner enough support to have legislation for same sex marriage passed.

Instead of the debate being held immediately - which would have seen the bill defeated --the gay marriage campaign has changed focus to increase pressure on Tony Abbott to change his mind and allow opposition MPs a conscience vote.

``The Coalition went to the last election as the party promising more individual freedom and less government interference in home life. Those values are consistent with a conscience vote on marriage equality,'' the national convener of Australian Marriage Equality, Alex Greenwich, said.

The Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young is likely to gain opposition support for an inquiry into gay marriage legislation when Parliament returns this week.

``A Senate inquiry will provide an opportunity to address the concerns of undecided and conflicted MPs, especially on issues like guaranteeing religious freedom and the drawbacks of civil unions,'' Mr Greenwich said.

Gay marriage advocates will meet opposition MPs this week to try to put pressure on the Opposition Leader to reverse his decision not to allow Coalition members a conscience vote.

There is a pragmatic view within the Coalition that it would be best to resolve the issue once and for all while Labor is in government.

Some Coalition MPs believe that if legislation is defeated this year it would be reintroduced at some point in the future and, assuming the Coalition wins the next election, they do not want to be dogged by the issue in government as Labor was last year.

Labor MP Stephen Jones, the author of a private member's bill to legalise same-sex marriage, declined to comment on the timing of his bill.

The bill is likely to be introduced in late March.

Even if Mr Abbott allowed a conscience vote it is uncertain whether there would be sufficient support within the Coalition for legislation to pass. But Mr Greenwich believes enough MPs are supportive of change.

``Based on the unstoppable momentum for a reform that continues to win hearts and minds in the wider community and the parliament, marriage equality could be a reality in 2012,'' he said.

Labor has adopted marriage equality as its official policy, but granted a conscience vote to its MPs.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Why not put it to a public referendum & let the public decide thats fair for all its the public who should decide their own or changes to our laws?
Posted by twistie, 5/02/2012 1:20:40 PM, on The Examiner
I can think of a few reasons not to put it to a referendum. Firstly the 1999 referendum cost $66 million dollars, estimates of what a referendum today would cost range between $100-$200 million dollars.

Second, and this is a big one, referendums are only for changing the constitution.

Third thousands of new and changed laws are passed without referendum every year there have only ever been a few dozen referendums in Australia's history.

Finally the most important reason is that this is a matter of equality and human rights and equality should not be subject to a popularity poll.

Posted by Rob, 5/02/2012 5:49:00 PM, on The Examiner
why should other people decide if 2 people can get married ?
Posted by ben, 5/02/2012 8:10:41 PM, on The Examiner

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




The Examiner Newspaper







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...