News 
 Local News 
 News 
 Politics 
 Pulp mill a sticking point 

Pulp mill a sticking point

27 Aug, 2010 09:29 AM
IT appears unlikely Gunns would be willing to go back to the drawing board on its pulp mill proposal even if that's what it would take to get conservation groups to back a mill in the Tamar Valley.

A draft proposal has circulated among conservation and industry groups involved in forestry peace talks, and - as reported in The Examiner two weeks ago - it includes in- principle support for a Tasmanian pulp mill.

However, the current proposal in the Tamar Valley is still a sticking point, with Gunns moving forward with it and environmental groups vowing never to support it as it stands.

When asked if it would consider a new proposal on the same site, Gunns had no comment yesterday.

But previously the company has said it intends to go ahead with the mill now that it has all the approvals.

It also reported last week that three partners were working with due diligence on the project.

The Wilderness Society and the Tasmanian Greens yesterday said they were not opposed to the principle of a pulp mill in the state, but could never support the existing Tamar Valley model.

Greens leader Nick McKim said he would look at another proposal in the Tamar Valley if Gunns put one up.

"I think it's unlikely that there will ever be a pulp mill built in the Tamar Valley given what has happen recently," he said.

"As I said, we don't support the current proposal, but we will look at any future proposal - if there is - one for a pulp mill in Tasmania on a case-by-case basis and with an open mind."

Wilderness Society national forest co-ordinator Tim Birch said the talks were about preparing a platform of principles for future negotiations.

"It should be made very clear, that if we reach agreement on these principles it will not give a green light to the Tamar Valley pulp mill," he said.

Environment Tasmania's Russell Warman said there was conservation support for a community-backed pulp mill. "We understand that the logging industry sees a pulp mill as an important part of its future, but the proposed mill and its approval process has been damaging and divisive in the community," he said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The Tamar Valley is a beautiful valley but it suffers from 2.5 particulate that kill at least 8 people a year. Under the present conditions we must stop all smoke not build another smoke producer such as a wood fired power station. The proposed pulp mill with it’s huge wood fired power station is not and never can be a suitable industry for the Tamar Valley. If you are a supporter of the proposed mill ask your self how many more deaths are acceptable because that is the price that must be paid.
Posted by max, 27/08/2010 10:21:27 AM, on The Examiner
Until Gunns accepts that the process in which they got their government approvals was flawed and, in essence, corrupt, the pulp mill will not have it's long desired 'social licence'. If Gunns is not willing to back to the drawing board and start again, then I am sure most anti-pulp mill activists won't give up either!
Posted by Leah Byrne, 27/08/2010 12:31:36 PM, on The Examiner
"But previously the company has said it intends to go ahead with the mill now that it has all the approvals." Get a life! Check your facts. Remember the Feds? Did I go to sleep for a year? Aren't Gunns doing a pack of studies for Garrett ... something to do with hydrodynamic modelling?
Posted by Garry Stannus, 27/08/2010 1:43:24 PM, on The Examiner
I am against the pulp mill as it stands, due, mainly to the way they got the licenses. The whole process was corrupt and the government didn't help that by passing laws designed to protect the mill. These laws protect the mill at the expense of people who's health could be adversly affected. I have not seen any evidence to support the claim that the mill would have no adverse affect on Launceston. I am not convinced that we would not see even more pollution within the city itself. Gunns departure from the RPDC process was exactly like that of a child taking there bat and ball and going home because they couldn't get there own way. So Gunns had a tantrum and the government caved in. Thats not the mark of a good parent!
Posted by Deb P, 27/08/2010 1:48:12 PM, on The Examiner
A pulp mill - Yes. That corrupt pulp mill - NO
Posted by Peter of Lot, 27/08/2010 1:55:03 PM, on The Examiner
It is interesting to see that so many people are against the pulp mill, meanwhile, nobody talks about wood heating in LTN. Is it that wood heating causes less pollution than the pulp mill?
Posted by Warren, 27/08/2010 6:07:43 PM, on The Examiner
Mate Max, What sort of drugs are you on? The Bell Bay Pulp Mill will be the cleanest in the world- otherwise it won't be built! Our Chips are going overseas to a pulp mill that certainly won't be built to the same standards that Gunns are proposing. Gunns are welcome to come and build their mill in my back yard if they like!
Posted by Mad Max, 27/08/2010 6:38:02 PM, on The Examiner
The rest of australia is sick of financially supporting Tasmania. Yes other states have to have mines and industry in their backyard to keep people employed and provide services. The Tassie want it all their own way, time to tell them to pay for their own upkeep. STOP BLUDGING TASMANIA !
Posted by gd, 27/08/2010 10:42:21 PM, on The Examiner

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
The Examiner's report on August 11.
The Examiner's report on August 11.

Most popular articles


Download The Examiner iPhone App


The Examiner Newspaper







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...