News 
 Local News 
 News 
 Politics 
 Proposed party wants probe into pulp mill 

Proposed party wants probe into pulp mill

12 Jan, 2010 08:14 AM
A NEW political party is calling for the Gunns Bell Bay pulp mill proposal to be reassessed.

The Ethics and Sustainability Party has lodged a party registration application with the Tasmanian Electoral Commission.

On its website the party lists two objectives: to oppose the 2007 fast-track assessment of the pulp mill and to stand candidates at the March 20 state election.

Interim vice-president of communications Peter Wilson said the party would stand candidates in a number of electorates for the election, and not just Bass, if the party was officially registered in time.

Mr Wilson said the Ethics and Sustainability Party - which had 250 members - was "not an anti-pulp mill party but an anti-fast-track assessment party".

"We see this as more than just a pulp mill issue," Mr Wilson said.

"There are quite a few issues relating to ethics which have dogged the Bartlett Government and a lot of people would regard the state Liberal Party as not really having done a great job in that area either."

Mr Wilson said his party's policies would attract voters who swing between Liberal and Labor but do not vote for the Greens.

"We are politically middle of the road," he said.

"Both Liberal and Labor parties could potentially benefit from our support in a post-March 20 government, depending on concessions each might agree to make regarding conducting a full, independent assessment of the proposed Gunns Tamar Valley pulp mill."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Had a look at their website at www.esparty.org and it seems like they are very similar to the Democrats. Not sure if the Democrats have a policy regarding fast track assessment of the pulp mill though.
Posted by Jason Anders, 12/01/2010 9:33:52 AM, on The Examiner
Unfortunately, like most single issue parties, they will not have much of an impact. Their preferences will end up flowing elsewhere to one of the major parties. Pro-mill supporters will state they only received a small vote, but at least there is the option for the protest vote before it does flow to the pro-pulp mill Liberals and Labor. Though talking about being apolitical, isn't it interesting that the TCCI, the self-proclaimed non-partisan, pro-pulp mill, business lobby, has employed the Bass Liberal candidate, after his nomination, to operate out of their Launceston office. And his job? To travel the state promoting the TCCI. I hope he remembers which business card to hand out. Now that is apolitical. Yeah, right.
Posted by Droid, 12/01/2010 9:35:49 AM, on The Examiner
Have to disagree with the Ethics & Sustainability Party being described as a single issue party. The reason for pulp mill fast-track-assessment being the only listed objective in the party's interim constitution, at www.esparty.org, is that it is the common element that we are quite sure all current members unanimously have agreed to back. The real issue for the party is twofold: Ethics in state government & Sustainable use of the states resources. The pulp mill and particularly its fast track assessment, seems at present to not measure up very well in either of these regards. But a full independent assessment might clear up so much as to the extent of these shortcomings. Following such assessment and publication of its conclusions, Tasmanians would be able to arrive at an informed opinion as to where they stand on the issue. An EMRS poll at that stage would be very insightful.
Posted by Peter Wilson, 12/01/2010 10:25:18 AM, on The Examiner
Usually when people or political parties talk of ethics they are really about enforcing their values and ethics on everyone else.I belong to the I Know Best ,What Is Good For Me And My Family Party aand will vote accordingly.If the other opposition parties can not change things,what makes you so mighty Mr Wilson.
Posted by Wally th worker, 12/01/2010 12:48:27 PM, on The Examiner
O.k sounds good to me , however i will make sure that it definetely gets off the ground before donating or otherwise. Pity about the name though ! How about simply, the " PEOPLES" party ! works for me. d.d.
Posted by don davey, 12/01/2010 4:48:55 PM, on The Examiner
The name is cumbersome, and some would suggest it means a limited policy platform. Glad someone is prepared to make a stand for ethics though, as they are actually involved in everything we do.
Posted by jose, 12/01/2010 5:55:27 PM, on The Examiner

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




The Examiner Newspaper







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...