News 
 Local News 
 News 
 Politics 
 Pokies `economy killers' 

Pokies `economy killers'

03 Mar, 2010 12:25 PM
PREMIER David Bartlett's Government is guilty of "premature exaltation" in its enthusiasm for Tasmania's $90-million- a-year poker machine revenue, says South Australia's anti- gambling senator, Nick Xenophon.

In Hobart yesterday for the Our Island Our Voices alliance, Senator Xenophon released a survey of 1000 Tasmanians that showed eight out of 10 want tighter regulations on the state's poker machines, including a single bet limit of a dollar.

His views about Tasmania's poker machine regulations had been overstated by Premier David Bartlett, Senator Xenophon said.

"Tasmania has the least worst of bad (poker machine) regimes only because there are no automatic tellers in your pubs and clubs," Senator Xenophon said.

"Your Government is turning its eye to jackpot junkies and is suffering from premature exaltation.

"Poker machines are an economy killer and not a job creator.

"Gambling taxes are fool's gold because 50 per cent of losses come from problem gamblers."

Spokesman for the Federal Group Brendan Blomeley said there was no evidence to support the claim that smaller bet limits would help problem gamblers.

He said he believed no other state or territory intended to drop the single pokie bet limit below $5.

Senator Xenophon urged the State Government to commit to a maximum single dollar bet.

In its draft recommendations on gambling the national Productivity Commission called for all states and territories to set the maximum bet limit on gaming machines to one dollar. The commission's final report has been sent to Assistant (federal) Treasurer Nick Sherry for comment.

Opposition Leader Will Hodgman said a Liberal majority government after the March 20 election would set the dollar limit.

Human Services Minister Lin Thorp said if other states went to a dollar, Tasmania would follow.

Mr Blomeley said he doubted the other states would agree to the $1 limit.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
This industry has questioned everything from pre commitment to monetary contributions of problem/at risk gamblers, prevalence rates etc saying there is not enough solid evidence for the recommendations of the Productivity Commission to be implemented. But this is a two way street as the standard of evidence they are seeking before they are willing to concede to such measures equally applies the other way. What solid evidence do they have that the current arrangements are justified/safe and that we must take their word for it that everything is under control with these machines. What makes their say so or their research ‘evidence’ so superior that it effectively grants them immunity to positively proving their case and as a result they just continue to operate as per usual. To date most of the harm minimisation measures have not surprisingly been of little use. Their ineffectiveness has ironically fuelled the industry's argument for the need of a greater certainty of success with further measures. If the core (and truly worthwhile) recommendations of the PC were implemented years ago things would have been alot different today.
Posted by tracy, 3/03/2010 4:38:06 PM, on The Examiner

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
(3/3)
(3/3)
(2/3)
(2/3)
*(1/3)
*(1/3)

Most popular articles


Download The Examiner iPhone App


The Examiner Newspaper







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...