News 
 Local News 
 News 
 Politics 
 McKim rejects Labor ministry offer 

McKim rejects Labor ministry offer

17 Apr, 2010 05:09 PM
Tasmanian Greens leader Nick McKim has rejected an offer from Premier David Bartlett to join the Labor cabinet, and has instead asked Mr Bartlett to make a ministry offer which ``better reflects the will of the Tasmanian people''.

Mr Bartlett offered Mr McKim a position on the front bench on Friday after the March 20 election delivered a hung parliament.

Mr McKim said the Greens' party room had decided that having only one Greens member in cabinet was unacceptable.

``It fails to provide for stable government in the current circumstances,'' he told reporters in Hobart this afternoon.

In a letter to Mr Bartlett, Mr McKim said the offer of only one ministry to the Greens would not deliver optimal government stability and urged Mr Bartlett to make a ``more reasonable offer'' by noon tomorrow.

Mr McKim's letter to Mr Bartlett:

Dear David,

It is with deep regret that I write to inform you that I am unable to accept your offer of a Ministry at this stage.

It is a great personal honour to have received your invitation, however, as I am sure you would agree, it does not reflect in any way the will of the Tasmanian people expressed on 20 March. In the context of the model that you have proposed, it also does not provide for the stability of government that the Tasmanian people expect and deserve.

I acknowledge the good faith and genuine intent with which you and Deputy Premier Lara Giddings conducted yourselves throughout our recent discussions. The model which was the result of those discussions, while not the Greens' preferred model, could have provided a framework for the inclusion of Greens' ministers in your Cabinet with a small number of improvements, which I have no doubt could have been achieved had our discussion not been curtailed by the time limits you imposed.

A strong and experienced Cabinet is crucial to stability and good governance. Your offer of a single ministry to the Greens does not, in our view, provide for the most capable, workable and stable Cabinet given the options available to you.

Having only one Green MP in the Cabinet would, again in our view, make it more difficult to fulfil the requirement set out in the proposed model that any Greens' ministers use their best endeavours to deliver Green party room support for Cabinet decisions.

I believe it would be unrealistic for me to expect my four colleagues to consistently support decisions that only I have been involved in making. Your offer of only one Cabinet position to the Greens therefore is less likely to deliver Parliamentary support for Cabinet decisions than a Cabinet that more closely reflects the composition of the proposed working majority on the floor of the House. Your offer, in our view, therefore fails to deliver optimal government stability in the circumstances.

Therefore, in order to best deliver a strong, working majority on the floor of the House to support Cabinet decisions, it would be preferable for you to make an offer to the Greens that better reflects the will of the Tasmanian people.

I wish to make it clear that if you are able to make a more reasonable offer that reflects the will of the Tasmanian people and provides for greater government stability, my party room would of course be prepared to consider it.

Could you please indicate to me by midday tomorrow whether you are in a position to make such an offer?

I again confirm the Greens' willingness to work constructively and cooperatively to deliver good governance and stable to the Tasmania people by working with all Members in the new Parliament.

David, I believe there has been a significant rebuilding of mutual respect between us over the course of the past week. It is my genuine wish that in the interests of Tasmania and its people that this can continue.

Thank you again for your offer. I look forward to your woking with you in the future in the interests of the Tasmanian people.

Yours sincerely,

Nick McKim.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
How much longer is this debacle to continue?Would be interesting to hear Alisons opinion on stability and minority government now!
Posted by Wally The Worker, 17/04/2010 5:05:35 PM, on The Examiner
"Will of the Tasmanian people" is laughable coming from this lot who ignored the will of the people to ensure that power mad labor and the self-interest greens could gain government. For Nick McKim to speak of the will of the people is a joke in the extreme.
Posted by Gopher, 17/04/2010 5:32:07 PM, on The Examiner
I agree with Gopher - the 'will of the Tasmanian people' when Libs got 10 seats and Greens only got 5??? I would not be surprised if a lot of disaffected Labor voters were unhappy with what has happened, if they voted either for Greens or Libs,and am sure many Labor voters did so believing the Premier's statement that he would make no deals with the Greens! the whole thing is a farce - wonder what would happen if we went back to the polls in the very near future? Surely voters would not be duped a second time? Bring on another poll!
Posted by tasnan49, 17/04/2010 6:24:17 PM, on The Examiner
Arithmetic: 10 Labs & 5 Greens means a government should be one third Green.
Posted by Fair Crack of the Whip, 17/04/2010 6:25:55 PM, on The Examiner
Can someone tell me why anyone would have thought that one ministry was going to work for either of them............for goodness sake stop wasting time and bring on another election. I'm sure all Tasmanians would oblige.
Posted by Caffelatte, 17/04/2010 6:29:40 PM, on The Examiner
The Greens should accept no ministry but simply act as well as possible in Tasmanians' interests. Why should they compromise their ideals for the value of Ministries "bestowed" on them? I see little merit in McKim's request.
Posted by brian, 17/04/2010 9:27:43 PM, on The Examiner
if it was the will of tasmania lab and lib ministries would happen, and they could get rid of the greens. Mckim and Bartlet are both power hungry and we can all see it - who will win the game - wont be tasmania.
Posted by Bill, 17/04/2010 9:40:31 PM, on The Examiner
Nobody is stopping Labor and Liberals forming a coalition with each other which would make sense since their policies are much more similar. If the Greens are to become part of a power sharing arrangement then the power should be shared in accordance to the proportion of the vote. This power vacuum is directly the fault of both major parties refusal to negotiate with the Greens or with each other. It is about time they accepted the fact that they did not win a majority and cannot get 100% of the power with less than 50% of the vote.
Posted by KAS, 18/04/2010 12:38:06 AM, on The Examiner
The reason we left the state was because of tasmanian politics, self interest and couldn't care less for the people who supposed they were elcted by!!
Posted by Wayne, 18/04/2010 5:27:46 AM, on The Examiner
Both Bartlett and Hodgman poisoned the waters by their stubborn and rude comments re The Greens prior to the election.Now they have to live with the fact that 20 percent of Tasmanians means exactly that.
Posted by Ian, 18/04/2010 7:31:08 AM, on The Examiner
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Greens leader Nick McKim.
Greens leader Nick McKim.
Labor Leader David Bartlett.
Labor Leader David Bartlett.

Most popular articles




The Examiner Newspaper







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...