News 
 Local News 
 News 
 Politics 
 Leaders agree on House size increase 

Leaders agree on House size increase

03 Sep, 2010 09:30 AM
TASMANIA'S three political leaders have signed a deal to restore the number of members in the House of Assembly to 35 at the next election.

The move would roll back the 1998 parliamentary deal between Labor and the Liberals that cut the number of MPs in the House of Assembly to the existing 25.

At the time the move was widely seen as an attempt to limit the potential for minority parties like the Greens to hold the balance of power.

Each leader will take the proposal to their respective parties for approval.

The proposal, signed by Premier David Bartlett, Opposition Leader Will Hodgman and Tasmanian Greens leader Nick McKim, calls for the House of Assembly to be restored to 35 members with seven members elected from each of the state's five divisions from the next general election.

There was no indication of a change in Legislative Council numbers. While Legislative Council President Sue Smith met the leaders on Monday, it is understood the talks were focused on the House of Assembly.

The proposal also includes provision for public consultation.

Mr McKim said the agreement was a "major milestone" for the Greens' 12-year campaign to restore the House of Assembly to 35 members.

"It is testimony to the opportunities presented by power-sharing parliaments, and a commitment to working together to deliver progressive outcomes for the community," he said.

"I sincerely thank David and Will for their constructive and collaborative approach, and I look forward to working with them to progress this issue to a resolution."

Mr Hodgman said the Parliamentary Liberal Party would meet later this month to consider the proposals.

"We have consistently and strongly argued that any proposed changes to the size of the House of Assembly must include consultation with the Tasmanian community," he said.

The proposal signed yesterday recognises that other parliamentary reform - including political donations, candidate expenditure, fixed parliamentary terms, the role and powers of parliamentary committees, a code of conduct for MPs, declarations of conflicts of interest and resources available to MPs - were more complex and required greater consultation.

The leaders resolved to examine these and other reform issues.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Just what will an increase in parliament do, will it cut the cost of an already top heavy government, no it will not even guarantee a more stable government as the extra members could well be Greens or Independents. The only thing that will guarantee a strong house is to elect a council. This will eliminate the stupid arguments that solve nothing, lets face it if a party has enough members to pass legislation they ignore the opposition, so why have an opposition. 500,000 people paying for all the snouts in the trough when we could be paying for hospitals and better schools.
Posted by max, 3/09/2010 10:35:26 AM, on The Examiner
i dont have a problem with it provided it is done within the current budget of expenditure i do not support any increase in expenditure - we simply can not afford it
Posted by IAN, 3/09/2010 11:42:44 AM, on The Examiner
This is a good thing. No, it won't increase the likelihood of majority government, but with the strict way parties control their members majority government results in a limited term dictatorship anyway. It does mean that one party should be able to provide a Cabinet, meaning the cross-benchers can be honest brokers again, rather than in the highly compromised position of having to support policies they don't support - as the Greens are often in now. Hopefully, admittedly this is unlikely, it can also mean that some the public servants who really perform political rather than public service roles can be sacked - saving many more dollars than the extra MPs will cost.
Posted by Timmuh, 3/09/2010 2:13:52 PM, on The Examiner

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
The opposition benches in State Parliament during the budget session in June.
The opposition benches in State Parliament during the budget session in June.

Most popular articles


Download The Examiner iPhone App


The Examiner Newspaper







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...