News 
 Local News 
 News 
 Politics 
 I took advice on court costs, says Bob Brown 

I took advice on court costs, says Bob Brown

10 Jun, 2009 08:04 AM
AUSTRALIAN Greens leader Bob Brown has defended his decision not to accept a settlement offer from Forestry Tasmania, which would have cut nearly $40,000 from his legal bills.

The Tasmanian senator is trying to raise nearly $240,000 to cover Forestry Tasmania's legal costs from his unsuccessful Federal Court challenge against logging in the Wielangta Forest on the East Coast.

Yesterday, Forestry Tasmania revealed it had earlier offered to settle the matter for $200,000, but that Senator Brown had rejected the offer - instead offering to pay $140,000.

Forestry Tasmania general manager of corporate relations Ken Jeffreys said the counter-offer was unacceptable.

Senator Brown yesterday maintained he was acting on legal advice when he decided to reject Forestry's offer.

"My advice was that even the current amount was too high, but the cost of litigating to get it brought down to where it should be would be as much as the savings that it might have involved," he said.

If Senator Brown does not pay the money by June 29, Forestry Tasmania may begin bankruptcy proceedings against him - which could cost him his seat in the Senate.

"I'm not going to let it (the debt) go beyond there (June 29) if I can help it," Senator Brown said.

He has already secured the support of high-profile entrepreneur Dick Smith, Northern Tasmanian gardening identity Peter Cundall, and Victorian Electrical Trades Union secretary Dean Mighell.

Mr Cundall said yesterday that helping Senator Brown cover the legal costs was a "natural instinct".

Mr Mighell said he would be happy to support Senator Brown - saying the Greens leader "took on a worthy cause".

Senator Brown said any donations above $300 would be declared publicly on the Senate's gifts register.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd yesterday said he was "quite distressed" to see news of Senator Brown's legal bill.

Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett said he had "some sympathy for Senator Brown's predicament".

"But at the end of the day, if you are going into the business of taking court action to challenge decisions then you are bound by the decisions that the court makes," Mr Garrett said.

EDITORIAL: Page20

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
How does the old saying go about if you make your own bed you should be prepare to sleep in it? Brown knew what he was doing and he knew the risks. If it was you or I in this situation we would be expected to pay up or suffer the consequences. Why should Bob Brown be treated any differently?
Posted by Chris, 10/06/2009 9:15:16 AM
Garrett conveniently leaves out how Brown won his Wielangta case, then Howard and Lennon modified the RFA, so that the court's decision could be appealed and the court would have to take into account their new version of the RFA when hearing the appeal. It was 'dirty pool'. They changed the rules after losing the game. Garret knows this. He made such a display of 'I'm just here to administer the law with regard to the pulp mill', it's ironical to see him virtually saying Brown shouldn't have attempted to make use of the law of the land. Howard and Lennon should have to pay his costs.
Posted by Garry Stannus, 10/06/2009 10:56:30 AM
We need to look beyond the next 30-50 years, and that is what Bob Brown is doing... and good on him!!! It doesn't look good that he hasn't the money to pay, but as the post from Garry Stannus says, the goal posts were moved after Bob Brown won to have FT stop its illegal logging of the Wielangta Forest... Labour, FT, Erica, and Lennon got all huffy, had the Tasmanian RFA changed and then appealed, to only have Bob Brown loose... How insidious is that - a precedence to totally undermine democracy!!! We are not upholding the RFA in anyway, and as far back as 1999 we have been in breach - http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200409/s1195126.htm!!! So what is being done about it??? We have a logging and clear-felling industry out of control that is being continuously propped up with tax payer's money for what? What makes more money in the end; a one-off logging industry that is making no money for our state, or a tourism industry that will be forever going because we have left Tasmania's unique beauty intact!
Posted by Henk of Launceston, 10/06/2009 5:46:55 PM
Bob Brown wants people to bail him out, but he knew what he was getting himself into. Bob might have also realised that gullible people might make donations to save his rear end from a financial pounding.
Posted by MickO, 10/06/2009 10:18:03 PM
I at least give Bob the credit that he isnt crying foul and is trying to raise the money.Sadly, if the rumours around the State are right their next planned actions to slow down the building of the pulp mill will see a new definition to militancy and exploitation.
Posted by Wally the worker, 11/06/2009 12:20:26 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Australian Greens leader Senator Bob Brown in Hobart yesterday.
Australian Greens leader Senator Bob Brown in Hobart yesterday.

Most popular articles


Download The Examiner iPhone App


The Examiner Newspaper







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...