News 
 Local News 
 News 
 Politics 
 FEA goes into voluntary administration 

FEA goes into voluntary administration

14 Apr, 2010 03:20 PM
LAUNCESTON timber company Forest Enterprises Australia has gone into voluntary administration after failing to refinance a $216 million debt.

FEA had also been negotiating to sell off assets or merge the company with another, unnamed, industry player.

But its banks, the ANZ and CBA, had refused a request to further extend repayments while FEA sought a solution to its financial woes - which it has blamed on a downturn in the sector associated with the Global Financial Crisis.

The jobs of 200 FEA workers and an unknown quantity of indirect beneficiaries remain in limbo while the administrator, BRI Ferrier, work through the administration process.

Forestry union representatives will meet with workers and FEA management at the company's Bell Bay sawmill this afternoon to hear from the administrators.

An approach for financial assistance from FEA to the State Government earlier this year was knocked back but Premier David Bartlett has today said the government would work closely with the voluntary administrator to help employees affected by the decision.

The government never gave a reason for deciding against assisting the business before the March 20 election.

But Mr Bartlett today said the Tasmanian Development Board recommended against supporting an assistance package because there was a substantial risk to taxpayer funds and uncertainties around the managed investment scheme industry.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
"Managed investment scheme"? Surely not!
Posted by brian, 14/04/2010 3:31:46 PM, on The Examiner
Bartlett couldn't give a commitment,he needed the support of the greens come election time.Dirty deeds done not cheap.Tasmanian workers finding that out.Wonder what the target will be once they have finished with forestry?They have started on mining,so all their energies will go into closing the mining industry next,what after that?
Posted by Noelene, 14/04/2010 3:46:47 PM, on The Examiner
last one out turn off the lights please .
Posted by tasmini125, 14/04/2010 5:40:42 PM, on The Examiner
The Greens have been warning for a decade that this industry was unsustainable, and now the global market place has proved them right. Forestry workers in this state have a right to be angry - at the lack of leadership from the Labor party, the Liberal party, and their own forestry union, who all refused to even consider restructuring this industry over the years, all for political reasons. Who can forget the words of Paul Lennon at previous elections - 'there will be no jobs lost in the forestry industry.' How wrong could he be! Richard Flanagan was absolutely right - forestry has poisoned the politics in this state and prevented so-called forestry leaders from being honest. And now the workers and contractors will pay the price. This industry is a dinosaur and needs restructuring so we have a sustainable, 21st century industry which all Tasmanians support and can proud of. Are our new political leaders up to the task?
Posted by Dave of Launceston, 14/04/2010 7:57:48 PM, on The Examiner
Noelene is right. The Greens have unlimited power. They can turn-down the global economy at will. They can set-up consumer-driven supply chain audits like the Bonn-based FSC. If they think a rock should remain underground, they will simply apply their celestial powers to the planet and it will stay where it is. No wonder they have wrapped the less-bright Libs and Labs around their little fingers. After the Atheists have arrested the Pope for crimes against humanity they should build temples to worship the Greens and their supernatural wisdom.
Posted by Jim McCluen, 14/04/2010 9:58:20 PM, on The Examiner
yes Brian - an MIS - one which returned 7.3% after tax to investors for it's first 2 plantation projects. Dave of Launceston - which industry have the Greens been warning us is unsustainable? Isn't it the Greens who want wood production from plantations rather than native forests in Tassy? Isn't that precisely what FEA are doing? Get on a step ladder, open the man-hole in your ceiling and have a look at what is holding your roof up. Hopefully it is greenhouse friendly, entirely re-newable wood, rather than greenhouse unfriendly non-renewable steel beams.
Posted by Balanced View, 15/04/2010 10:44:02 AM, on The Examiner
People who think FEA's woes are caused by the Greens are living in a weird cuckoo land. There is a completely different perspective on this which casts light on the incompetent decisions made by Labor Governments and Forestry Tasmania. Remember Auspine? It was a profitable little company milling pine logs in Scottsdale until the rug was pulled from under its feet in 2007 when its resource was allocated to FEA. (The fact that Auspine had supported protecting oldgrowth forests apparently had nothing to do with the decision) The decision to allocate Auspine's resource to FEA was made by a Forestry Tasmania joint venture with Bob Gordon on its board. Their argument - that FEA had a better long-term business plan than Auspine did - is now in tatters. What a debacle by the owners and managers of Tasmanian public resources. It's a pity the media do not seem to remember this decision, which happened all of 3 years ago.
Posted by Geoff Law, 15/04/2010 11:40:02 AM, on The Examiner

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




The Examiner Newspaper







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...