News 
 Local News 
 News 
 Politics 
 $240,000 court costs bill for Bob Brown 

$240,000 court costs bill for Bob Brown

09 Jun, 2009 12:31 PM
AUSTRALIAN Greens leader Bob Brown faces the prospect of losing his Senate seat if he is unable to raise almost $240,000 in courts costs by the end of the month.

In December 2006, the Federal Court found in favour of Senator Brown's claim that Frestry Tasmania's logging in the Wielangta Forest, on the East coast, threatened endangered species.

However, that decision was overturned and Senator Brown was ordered to pay the costs for Forestry Tasmania.

In a letter dated May 29, Senator Brown was ordered to pay the amount by June 29.

The clerk of the Senate, Harry Evans, advised Senator Brown that he would be disqualified from the Senate and his seat would become vacant if he does not pay the money and is declared bankrupt.

Forestry Tasmania has denied that it is targeting Senator Brown.

Acting managing director Hans Drielsma said Forestry Tasmania had followed legal process and had not made any special allowances for Senator Brown.

"We believe we have provided Senator Brown with ample time and opportunity to settle this matter," he said.

Mr Drielsma also said that the amount was determined by the Registrar of the Federal Court.

But Senator Brown has accused Forestry Tasmania of what he labelled pressure tactics.

"It's very clear that this is a pressure game by Forestry Tasmania, no doubt with political backing, to threaten my seat in the Senate," he said.

"I am not going to back off from defending Tasmania's magnificent wild forests and their wildlife - not now, not ever."

He also said that if he was unable to pay on time, was declared bankrupt and then lost his seat, it would go "against the democratic wishes of Tasmanians who want their forests represented in the way they are in the Senate".

Senator Brown said he did not have the money available and that he had already spent a significant amount on the case.

He said he launched the action independently of the Greens and would not be dipping into the party's campaign reserves to make up the shortfall.

"The public has been extraordinarily generous in supporting that court case to the effect of more than $600,000 over the four years," he said.

"I'll be sending out another and final appeal note but the deadline's just a couple of weeks away and I'll be looking at other ways of funding."

Senator Brown said he would consider taking out a loan and selling items such as artwork.

"I've got no worries about selling more of it but the problem here is the time line," he said.

Wilderness Society spokesman Paul Oosting said the society would be unlikely to help Senator Brown raise the money, but he said it was "inappropriate" for Forestry Tasmania to seek the costs.

"The case exposed - and the judge agreed in the first instance - that logging was driving species closer to extinction," he said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Really makes you wonder if it's worth it just for a few trees. Guess Mr Brown will have to sell off his assets and build a cubby house in one of those trees to live in.
Posted by Dan, 9/06/2009 9:28:01 AM
Typical Greeny.........Expecting others to pay his way for him. How about taking a loan out to pay it, Bob. Surely you can afford that on your income. I am disgusted!!
Posted by Jono, 9/06/2009 9:33:45 AM
Maybe you "out of touch emotional knockers" should look further into why Bob Brown is in this predicament... He originally won the court case because FT was illegally logging sensitive areas in the Wielangta State Forest. FT, with the Lab in full toe, had amendments made to the Native Forestry Agreement Act, and then made an appeal that overturned Bob Brown's original win!!! They moved the goal posts and set a precedence letting us all know that if they lose, they will change the rules!!! Maybe this issue is highlighting that us Tasmanians will be going to the poll much earlier than what we think... Bob Brown is a man of conviction and vision, and I take my hat of too him... Something that the Lib/Lab could all take a spoon full of!!!
Posted by Henk of Launceston, 9/06/2009 10:03:59 AM
This is a serious political problem, this is big business controlling a politician by threatening there job. Political preferences aside it looks like all politicians fighting for a political cause against the rich and powerful had better be careful about this precedent if this is played out to its stated conclusion.
Posted by Davo, 9/06/2009 10:17:42 AM
Bob is always on about people paying for their mistakes and calling for their resignations when they make one.. now it is time to pay for his own. It's amazing how the Greens don't like pay for their mis-judgemets and media propaganda. Once again the forest industry has proven to be environmentally sound. Don't cry poor Bob, be a man and pay your dues yourself.
Posted by Jason, 9/06/2009 10:46:08 AM
Senator Brown needs to learn that there are ramifications to going around taking legal action against anyone with a political agenda different to one's own.
Posted by Claire, 9/06/2009 10:51:29 AM
Suck Eggs Bob Brown. I hope you are loosing sleep over the fact you may loose your job! Your actions (Direct/Indirect) have casued pain and sufferring to many hard working Tasmanian families. Pay up or Get Out!
Posted by Marcus, 9/06/2009 11:51:19 AM
Lets all be 100% honest Mr Brown,like anyone else you would have expected your legal fees to be paid by the other party had you won the case.As for some form of legal conspiracy and moving of goal posts this is the typical Green cry whenever things dont go their way.I for one am tired of them holding this State to ransom for their hidden agendas.
Posted by Wally the worker, 9/06/2009 12:21:01 PM
This is just the latest in a series of fund raising stunts. Brown has been begging for money to fund this legal folly since 2005. The full court of the Federal Court found that the lower court judge was wrong and made a mistake that wasted over a dozen days of the court time. Brown is not being asked to reimburse the taxpayer for that waste but only to pay costs associated with the appeal by the Commonwealth and by FT. How much has he paid the Commonwealth? After all he started this and should have been prepared to pay for it! Environment Tasmania is also begging for cash to fund its legal case against the State Parliament's approval of the pulp mill.
Posted by kraft of pristine valley, 9/06/2009 2:22:48 PM
Tough tits,Bob! As I understand matters you were aware some 12/18 months ago that you had this liability. Further I heard you on ABC this morning saying that you were not povity stricken as , being a Senator, you had a very comfortable income. Had it not been for your machinisations in the Franklin Dam dispute we would have ample Hydro power in our State. You,and your financial backers, have a lot to answer for to Tasmanians. Especially all those families,by your conivance, are without income. The sooner Tasmania is without you as one of our Senators the better !
Posted by borani, 9/06/2009 6:44:32 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Bob Brown
Bob Brown

Most popular articles




The Examiner Newspaper







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...