News 
 Local News 
 News 
 Health 
 Hospital program cut a `false economy' 

Hospital program cut a `false economy'

05 Jan, 2012 08:56 AM
A GROUP fighting to save Launceston's Hospital in the Home program plans to target Bass Labor MHR Geoff Lyons and Health Minister Michelle O'Byrne.

Click here to have your say in our online poll

The Launceston General Hospital will suspend the program on January 6 as part of drastic measures to save $28 million this financial year.

Sophie Hill, of Save It Tasmania, said she had contacted Mr Lyons after it was announced that the service would be axed in mid-December and was disappointed by Mr Lyons's response.

The former LGH spokesman and surgical business manager forwarded the concerns on to Ms O'Byrne.

Yesterday, Mr Lyons said he had been involved in securing a federal government grant to get the program started in the mid-1990s but understood why it had to go.

''If you have got plenty of money, Hospital in the Home is nice,'' Mr Lyons said.

''It's an expensive way of looking after people. You don't see too many GPs running their practice by making home visits.''

He said people still had access to a community nursing service.

However, supporters of the service say it saves money in the long run by keeping people out of hospital and frees up beds for other people.

Professor Sarah Breier, who founded the program, said it was a false economy.

''It's a quick fix to save money, but it's only going to end up costing more,'' she said.

Acting federal Health Minister Nicola Roxon declined to comment on the axeing of the Hospital in the Home program, but her spokesman said:

''The Gillard government is providing record funding to Tasmania for its health and hospital system and we remain concerned about the government's decision to reduce the funding to health services in the state, the impact it will have on Tasmanians' access to hospital care, and the potential effect this may have on health outcomes.''

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Geoff lyons shows complete ignorance on the benefits of hospital in home, his comments on it being expensive to run is complete nonsense compared to the daily cost of keeping someone in hospital. He needs to spend more time on the people he was elected to represent, the people of bass.
Posted by johnno, 5/01/2012 7:29:37 AM, on The Examiner
I absolutely support hospital in the home but axing it will save money for one simple reason. Even though it keeps people out of hospital that does not mean an empty bed because bed occupancy is at 100% continuously. So all the beds are full just now some of the people in them would otherwise have been at home incurring HITH costs and someone else would have been in the bed incurring bed costs. It has the same effect as closing a further 10 beds in terms of blocking access to the system and is a way of cutting more elective surgery by stealth by making sure beds aren't available. Underhanded.
Posted by Rob, 5/01/2012 8:08:25 AM, on The Examiner
Just to paraphrase - "If you have got plenty of money, politicians like Geoff Lyons are nice. But it is an expensive way of looking after the people that they have been elected to represent. You don't see too many Labour politicians running the health system in an effective way". Disgraceful, Mr Lyons.
Posted by Paul, 5/01/2012 8:30:40 AM, on The Examiner
''It's an expensive way of looking after people". Sorry Geoff, as a nurse at the LGH it saves us so much money, frees up beds AND keeps people at home.


Posted by Insider, 5/01/2012 8:47:44 AM, on The Examiner
I think the inference from Mr Lyons is that Hospital in the Home is politically expendable. Of course it is a cost saving to keep people well and out of hospital, if there was the possibility of admission. However under the new Giddings/O'Byrne regime, unless these patients condition has deteriorated to be extremely acute (read, life threatening), they won't be getting a bed anyway. Hence the cynical realisation that you can cut HIH without necessarily, or immediately, driving up costs.

The emergency brake has been pulled in DHHS, the train is wrecked, and good workers left to bleed out.

Posted by Fatboy, 5/01/2012 9:25:34 AM, on The Examiner
My wish is that the home program will continue as its a great help and leaves beds free.
Posted by julie Geard, 5/01/2012 9:33:13 AM, on The Examiner
To remove the Hospital in Home program reeks of mismanagement by this Labor Goverment, more is to be saved by retaining this program, than the alternative of the new system which will mean more beds will be taken up in hospitals. I am a pensioner, who has voted for Labor all my adult life, never again.
Posted by Ronnie Geard, 5/01/2012 9:43:42 AM, on The Examiner
As usual Geoffrey, take the easy way out!

You forgot that the people that elected you required that you make some hard decisions, decisions that were in the best interest of those that elected you .

Shame !

Posted by barneyboy, 5/01/2012 10:23:33 AM, on The Examiner
Go Ronnie Geard....Green-Never; Labor-Never Again
Posted by Fatboy, 5/01/2012 10:26:07 AM, on The Examiner
I feel insulted Mr Lyons - inferring HITH is indulgent. I do take it personally as anyone who is in hospital on a regular basis, knows its not a nice place to be.

It appears to me you have a closed mind on this subject - SAD - when you are a political figure voted in by the people, you should be listening and taking note of the people.

Posted by Wake Up, 5/01/2012 10:33:25 AM, on The Examiner
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




The Examiner Newspaper







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...