News 
 Local News 
 News 
 Health 
 Health staff concern over legal action 

Health staff concern over legal action

16 Nov, 2011 07:26 AM
THE Health Department has assured medical staff they will be protected from legal action if patients seek damages for delayed surgery.

The issue of risk management and medical indemnity was raised at yesterday's meeting between unions and executives at the Launceston General Hospital.

Department acting secretary Greg Johannes has sought details from hospitals of their risk management strategies ahead of bed closures and surgery cuts this financial year.

"Risk management strategies have been an integral part of planning our savings strategies and risk will continue to be monitored and managed actively," he said.

The Health and Community Services Union said that the 11th- hour request was concerning.

"We would have thought these strategies would have been put in place before any cuts were announced," assistant secretary Tim Jacobson said.

Australian Nursing Federation state secretary Neroli Ellis said that nurses were particularly worried about how to manage emergency presentations with fewer beds.

The LGH will close its medical ward 4D at the end of this year, with 20 surgical beds and two operating theatres to follow.

Director of surgery Berni Einoder said that while most patients were aware of the budget situation, medical staff wanted guaranteed protection from legal action if a patient believed they had waited too long for surgery.

"There is a risk people will get angry and instead of getting angry with the government they will get angry with doctors and nurses," he said.

Mr Johannes said that the savings strategies did not introduce any unusual indemnity issues for medical staff employed by the department.

"As such, all medical indemnity currently in place continues to apply," he said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Well I have now been waiting 7 months for Elective Surgery when the waiting period that's recommended is 90 days. I propose all the people waiting twice as long and longer than 90 days should start a class action against the Hospital and Government.
Posted by Christine, 16/11/2011 8:59:41 PM, on The Examiner

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
*(1/2)
*(1/2)
(2/2)
(2/2)

Most popular articles




The Examiner Newspaper







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...