News 
 Local News 
 News 
 Health 
 20 beds and a ward set to go in just a week 

20 beds and a ward set to go in just a week

08 Dec, 2011 03:31 PM
THE Launceston General Hospital will take a week from December 19 to cut its 60 surgical beds to 40.

It is understood that hospital staff received a memo this week outlining the gradual shutdown as part of the hospital's cost-cutting measures.

Both wards 5A and 5B will be affected with beds closed as patients are discharged to achieve the targeted 20 beds by December 23.

The empty beds will be stored off-site and the unused patient rooms will be closed.

It is understood that the reduction in bed numbers will coincide with the LGH's traditional Christmas slowdown when the number of elective surgery operating theatres is reduced from six to four.

But the theatres will not reopen early next year.

At the same time ward 4D, which is to be closed permanently, will start its shutdown from December 16.

Only short-stay patients will be admitted and the last patients on 4D will be discharged by December 21.

This will allow staff to clean the ward and close it by December 23.

LGH chief executive John Kirwan told staff last week that the hospital would achieve the $28 million it had to save this financial year as part of the government's health cuts through a range of measures including:

Shutting two intensive care unit beds and cutting the number of children's ward beds to 17.

Reducing pathology and radiology after-hours service.

Cutting the Hospital-in-the-Home program.

Cutting back on attendants and orderlies hours and merging unit manager roles as well as shutting down the two elective surgery operating theatres, 20 surgical ward beds and ward 4D.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Whatever happened to all those promises the alp has bleated over these past years on health in Tas? Where did the '1st lady', premier, leave all those ideals, can do's & reality checks go? How long can the alp sprout jingoisms & expect people to believe them? Everyday by the look of it. Poor fools keep believing her & them.
Posted by anon like the rest of ewe, 8/12/2011 5:32:31 AM, on The Examiner
DISGRACEFUL!!!

What rubbish this Government is

Posted by Fed up, 8/12/2011 6:52:44 AM, on The Examiner
We can only ask ONCE MORE, "How much cost-cutting has been performed on sport as the state government supports it?"
Posted by Buck Emberg, 8/12/2011 7:20:17 AM, on The Examiner
You know the stupidity is, it's not a lack of patients, it's the buck passing by admin to try and justify themselves. Basically the government recognises admin are more important than front line clinical staff to attend to patients. After all that's what they do!
Posted by Paul Carroll, 8/12/2011 7:48:09 AM, on The Examiner
Buck Emberg 8.20. A very good question. All our Labor Govts. seem to be falling over backwards to throw money at mega rich professional sports and to hell with services, hospitals etc.

Why car racing ( a sport for very rich companies and individuals) has to be supported financially by a broke Govt. beggars belief. The same applies to football. Instead of paying for the privilege to use our grounds they expect a hand out and our Govt. is too stupid not to fall for it.

It would appear they care more for the mega rich than for people needing hospitals etc.

Posted by payo, 8/12/2011 8:00:32 AM, on The Examiner
Call an election. Get rid of these pollies.
Posted by Aaron, 8/12/2011 8:14:14 AM, on The Examiner
I. Am sick of hearing about the most important thing our basic right to expect to be cared for when we are I'll.when cutting costs why don't politicians cut there pay packet ?no they wouldn't do that ,politicians need to be made accountable for They get off too easy .It's about time we the public made a stand against them Fed up..
Posted by Margaret, 8/12/2011 8:51:49 AM, on The Examiner
How will cutting the Hospital-in-the-Home program possiblty save ANY money? The Hospital-in-the-Home program enables patients to recupriate in their homes whilst still under the care of the hospital. It must be surely cheaper than keeping the patient in hospital?? Unless they are just going to discharge the patient and say "good luck"? I would like an explanation as to why the Hospital-in-the-Home program is being cut - do you think I will get it?
Posted by Ron, 8/12/2011 8:59:03 AM, on The Examiner
Why isn't the hospital system run like a business? If you are not making enough money to stay viable you need to introduce new products or look at new markets.

Instead of closing the beds down, sell them to the private sector, keep the money coming to keep the business going and the staff employed. The money generated this way will surely hasten public delivery of health services, because a smart business person would cost it out to cover overheads, that the government seems to be having so much trouble covering. Think outside the square!

Posted by Mr Sensible, 8/12/2011 9:24:12 AM, on The Examiner
Not good enough! The failures of the past are now upon us and there is no accountability by Politicians.

A Camel was a horse designed by a committee and this parliamentary Greens committee led lot, remind us of turkeys running around in ever decreasing circles until they vanish which will be inevitable at the next election. All the Greens per McKim are worried about is gay marriage while Rome burns.

Posted by jack72, 8/12/2011 9:44:21 AM, on The Examiner
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




The Examiner Newspaper







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...