News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Mother says killer's sentence an insult 

Mother says killer's sentence an insult

29 Jul, 2010 08:33 AM
A MOTHER has described the sentence handed down to a teenage killer yesterday as an insult to her son's memory.

``It is ludicrous,'' Lavinia Dingle said after learning her son's killer could walk free from jail in less than 12 months.

Coffs Harbour man Simon Dingle, 27, died after a stranger launched a senseless attack from behind at Deloraine in January. Mr Dingle was punched in the skull with such force his vertebral artery was severed.

The attacker _ a 17-year-old Parkham male whose identity is protected by law _ had pleaded guilty to manslaughter and was yesterday handed a three-year prison sentence in the Supreme Court in Launceston.

But he will be eligible for parole before this time next year.

``How cheap is life in this our country of Australia?'' Ms Dingle asked from her Coffs Harbour home yesterday.

``What sort of message are we sending to the youth of today?

``Certainly this sentence will not act as a deterrent _ and it's certainly not much of a punishment.''

Ms Dingle, accompanied by Mr Dingle's two younger brothers, had flown to Launceston last week to stand before the court holding a photograph of her son.

``Please don't allow my son to have died in vain,'' she pleaded after telling the court how her son's death had devastated her family.

That victim impact statement was yesterday acknowledged by Chief Justice Ewan Crawford when he

handed down the sentence.

``(Mr Dingle's) violent death has shocked and devastated the family,'' the judge said.

``His mother's victim impact statement made that very clear.

``All who heard it would have been deeply moved by it.''

But Ms Dingle says words are not enough.

``As a society we need to make a stand before it's too late,'' she said.

``Enough is enough.

``Apparently it will take a politician's son to be killed in this manner before the powers that be take a serious look at our antiquated legal system and make the necessary changes.

``Too late for my son.''

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Compare this sentence to that of the killer of John Lennon? That man is still behind bars after 29 years. The difference between 'manslaughter' and 'murder' in this case seems very thin.
Posted by Karl Stevens, 29/07/2010 5:20:58 AM, on The Examiner
This is SICK. He should get at least 6yrs no parole. Judges need to get real. No matter that he didnt intend to kill but he intended to hurt a lot that is why he did kill, because of the power of the hit he gave the victim.
Posted by beejaz wolf, 29/07/2010 7:28:08 AM, on The Examiner
What an absolute disgrace, this sentence in no way fits the crime, as stated what message are we trying to put across with sentences like this, one step down would be a slap on the wrist. Isn't it about time we got serious about crime and criminals?
Posted by AJ, 29/07/2010 7:55:45 AM, on The Examiner
And yet another fine message sent out to our gutless society and its miscreants. Would be interesting to see if this cretin had any past history for assault. My heart bleeds for the victim's family
Posted by Ian W O'Neill, 29/07/2010 8:17:10 AM, on The Examiner
This is the worst in a recent series of manifestly lenient sentences from both the Supreme and Magistrates Court.s It is a total disgrace. The public has no confidence in the judiciary to set sentences that act as a deterrent and suitably reflect the seriousness of a crime. The result of this failure to heed the victim's voice is that angry young people think they can get away with any appalling act of violence; and based on this sentence they'd be right. I imagine that Judges and Magistrates don't read anything smaller than a broadsheet so they are unlikely to hear this public message of contempt, but perhaps if we keep the pressure on long enough they'll be forced to get in touch with community expectations. Rehabilition; absolutely, but only after an appropriate sentence, including a non-parole period.
Posted by fatboy, 29/07/2010 9:06:14 AM, on The Examiner
This IS an insult to the victim, his parents, family, friends and the whole community. When will enough be enough of these pathetic sentences? When will Magistrates impose real sentences that reflect the communities wishes?
Posted by Tasbug, 29/07/2010 9:06:54 AM, on The Examiner
A woman gets 6 years for misappropriating 1 million from a government corporation which could have stopped her via the use of simple security measures, and this guy gets a kiss and a "be good now" for killing someone....what a complete and utter farce this country's justice system is becoming!
Posted by George Pike, 29/07/2010 9:08:28 AM, on The Examiner
As a new mother, sitting here looking at the precious little boy we have created, I am utterly devestated by this story. As a society we need to stand up and say enough is enough - we will not be frightened into silence by these gutless criminals who have no respsect for anyone or anything. The sentence is far too lenient - it is time for a review of our criminal code and to really get tough. How dare these boys think it is funny or appropriate to hit an innocent stranger; how dare young men think it is alright to hit a man in the street when he is walking home from dinner in the city with his family; how dare the at-large bank robber think it allright to waltz into a country bank and steal money and frighten the life out of witnesses - these few examples of recent crime are a sad indictment on our society and the fact that we, the hard-working, law-abiding citizens, sit back and despair while our elected representatives fail to act. To the Dingle family - I am so sorry for your loss and hope that your beautiful son's death is not in vain and that my beautiful boy can grow up in a safe and respectful society.
Posted by Rachel, 29/07/2010 9:34:44 AM, on The Examiner
You get a longer sentence for small time embezzlement.. These kinds of sentences incourage vigilante justice!
Posted by Fed up, 29/07/2010 9:40:53 AM, on The Examiner
If the courts won't take action, who will? "
Posted by weak courts, 29/07/2010 10:24:34 AM, on The Examiner
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

Most popular articles

Stevenson Prestiges
1) Apple iPhone 4 32GB44 plans 12%
2) Apple iPhone 4 16GB44 plans 14%
3) Motorola Quench7 plans 3%
4) HTC Desire4 plans 1%
5) Apple iPhone 3GS 8GB33 plans 2%

Mobile Phones | Broadband Plans

Get the best deal at Fairfax Digital - Rural Press



Membership: login | join

The Examiner Newspaper







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Navigate

Classifieds

More Ways to Read

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2010. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...