News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 First Basin swimming pool fence set to stay 

First Basin swimming pool fence set to stay

17 Nov, 2009 07:34 AM
A FENCE installed around Launceston's First Basin swimming pool will stay in place over summer, despite criticism from members of the public who have labelled it "ugly".

The Launceston City Council installed the controversial fence last month.

The fence has been designed to be dismantled during the winter months when the pool is not in use.

However, there has been a public backlash with opponents saying the fence ruins the "aesthetic and visual appeal" of the Gorge and is a "shock to the eyes".

Yesterday, Alderman Jeremy Ball sought support to request a review into the "performance" of the fence over the 2009-10 summer.

However, the motion was defeated.

Deputy Mayor Frank Nott said he believed the fence was necessary - even if it did impinge on the area's visual appeal.

He pointed to recent figures showing 32 Australian children aged zero to four had drowned in the 12 months to June 30, with 60 per cent of them drowning in swimming pools.

Alderman Ray Shipp said that the council should aim to minimise dangers to the public wherever possible.

"If we take that fence away and the following week we have a disaster, how is this council going to live with it?" Alderman Ship asked.

In other matters, the council approved development applications for the $1.5 million regional tennis facility in Newstead.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Is the gorge itself fenced? It is much deeper and murkier than the pool...
Posted by LJ, 17/11/2009 8:34:36 AM, on The Examiner
I think its a great idea, good on the council.
Posted by THarris, 17/11/2009 9:00:56 AM, on The Examiner
I went to the basin for the first time in months last Sunday. I was pleasantly surprised to see the fence and was not aesthetically shocked at all. I think it should be extended across the lawn to cover the main access to the lake as well so parents picnicking with little kids have a lot more peace of mind. I always thought it hypocritical that council would have such an open pool while they enforce strict standards on home pools. Congrats to the LCC for these changes.
Posted by Simon Fraser, 17/11/2009 9:26:04 AM, on The Examiner
The risk of a kid drowning in a swimming pool at home while mum and dad are busy inside is far greater than when the parents are near by at the gorge. If one parent isnt watching while at the gorge there would be 10 more watching their kids and would notice if there was a kid in trouble. I think it does take some of the beauty away from the basin. The governnment has just spent millions on upgrades to the gorge so that people can view it from a higher vantage point apon arrival now they add a fence to impair that.. If you're fencing the pool -- which has nice clean visible water -- how can you not fence the river basin with its dark murky water? If someone did fall below the surface of the river you would not see them at all.
Posted by Tezwah, 17/11/2009 12:27:28 PM, on The Examiner
I find the Deputy Mayor and Alderman Ray Shipps comments re safety aspects of having the fence around the pool, when there is a very obvious body of water in the same area and the fence around the pool is not even finished... Check out picture in todays examiner right above the ladies head????
Posted by Scotswebb, 17/11/2009 1:40:07 PM, on The Examiner
At what point does a parent not become responsible for their child(ren). It's a poor state of affairs if parents cannot control their children while visiting public places. What about the deep gorge itself, the chairlifts don't have cages, what's to stop a child climbing up over the suspension bridge.... the list is endless.
Posted by Disgusted, 17/11/2009 2:54:26 PM, on The Examiner
The sensible option would of been to fence the play area like a lot of councils are doing with playgrounds near waterways. Parents can let their kids play with out having worry about them running down to the pool or basin. Some new play equipment for the littlies would be nice too since there doesnt seem to be much there these days. Most parents supervise their young children well at the pool any way and the fence is pointless with the large body of deep water nearby. Why doesnt the council consult the general public for ideas before going ahead with an expensive and unnecessary waste of tax payers funds?
Posted by unimpressed, 17/11/2009 4:37:11 PM, on The Examiner
What were the other options... lifeguards? I'd prefer an 'ugly' fence over a dead or harmed child any day. Well done LCC on bringing public safety into the 21st century cos they don't make parents like they used to.
Posted by Fred, 17/11/2009 4:39:32 PM, on The Examiner
Yes, an ugly fence is better than a dead child. Ugly is subjective, while death is permanent.
Posted by RMS, 17/11/2009 6:00:09 PM, on The Examiner
the fence is there to cut insurance premiums therefore allowing more revenue to the fatcats to have more funds for junkets overseas to determine if fences are feasible
Posted by such, 17/11/2009 10:13:38 PM, on The Examiner
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Amy Wighton and son Ezra, 3, of Launceston, at the pool at the First Basin. Picture: PAUL SCAMBLER
Amy Wighton and son Ezra, 3, of Launceston, at the pool at the First Basin. Picture: PAUL SCAMBLER

Most popular articles


Download The Examiner iPhone App


The Examiner Newspaper







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...