News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 East Launceston prices rise by 93% 

East Launceston prices rise by 93%

06 Feb, 2012 07:18 AM
EAST Launceston was the state's most expensive suburb in 2011, according to the latest property figures.

The Real Estate Institute of Tasmania's December quarter report, due out today, shows the median house price in the suburb increased 93 per cent in 2011 to $690,000.

This is more than twice the statewide median of $305,000.

REIT president Adrian Kelly said the report highlighted the mixed messages of the Tasmanian property industry.

``Before Christmas, real estate agents were delighted to experience an increased level of interest from property owners to go on the market, accompanied by an increased attendance at open homes and auctions,'' he said.

``However, many buyers are still sitting tight and waiting to see which direction the market takes.''

Overall Launceston's median house price rose 3.7 per cent to $280,000 in the December quarter.

In the same period Hobart's median house price rose 5.8 per cent to $365,000.

Statewide the median house price was down 4.7 per cent for the year.

The number of houses going under the hammer was up by 3.2 per cent in the quarter.

Mr Kelly said while this was a positive sign, the figure was still down 9.4 per cent on the same time last year.

Launceston saw 213 houses sold during the quarter.

Units, flat and other dwellings proved hard to sell in Launceston with sales down 23.6 per cent for the quarter and 17.6 per cent down for the year.

However, prices for this category rose by 13.4 per cent to $232,500 in Launceston between October and December.

Kings Meadows ($261,000), Launceston City ($375,000), South Launceston ($263,000) and Trevallyn ($300,000) all saw their median house prices drop in 2011 by 9.8 per cent, 12.8 per cent, 6.1 per cent and 9.4 per cent respectively.

Meanwhile, Invermay's median price climbed 12.8 per cent to $249,223.

TOP 10 GROWTH AREAS

(In median price terms for 2011.)

East Launceston: 93.0 per cent

Seven Mile Beach: 35.5 per cent

South Arm: 30.9 per cent

Waverley: 26.5 per cent

Lauderdale: 15.9 per cent

Tranmere: 15.2 per cent

Invermay: 12.8 per cent

Mount Nelson: 9.1 per cent

Ravenswood: 8.3 per cent

West Hobart: 8.2 per cent

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
This is the fallacy of "house price rise" statistics. Month one 3 homes sell, A for 300,000 B for 200,000 and C for 250,000. Month two house D sells for 450,000, E for 500,000 and F for 550,000. Average for month one 250,000, average for month two 500,000, headline the property market has gone up by 50% we're saved. It doesn't reveal that house D,E and F previously sold for an average of 750,000 so there's actually been a 30% fall. In depressed times more lower value homes sell, as recovery occurs higher value homes start to sell, average price can rise whilst individual home values fell.
Posted by Rob, 6/02/2012 5:59:36 AM, on The Examiner
Watch the rates go up now
Posted by Ratepayer, 6/02/2012 6:46:04 AM, on The Examiner
93% or 9.3%. Is this a typo Examiner ?
Posted by mjf, 6/02/2012 9:08:31 AM, on The Examiner
No typo, it's 93%.
Posted by Simon Tennant on 6/02/2012 10:46:13 AM
More spruiking from Adrian Kelly. 9700 odd houses/units on the market at the moment, lots have been there for a long time according to Refind. Real estate agents are closing up shop as the business slowly dries up, and the late comers into real estate sales go back to doing what they did before the boom. Would be buyers are not buying for several reasons, with one of them being that prices remain well and truly inflated .
Posted by Not Buying, 6/02/2012 1:11:36 PM, on The Examiner
What a crock! So you're telling me that if I bought my house in East Ltn 12 ago for approx $450,000, I could expect a 93% increase if I sold now - I DON'T THINK SO!

While some of the facts in this story may be correct, the interpretation leaves a lot to be desired. I feel sorry for those people that now think their house is worth 93% more than it was 12 months ago.


Posted by Local resident, 7/02/2012 8:45:24 AM, on The Examiner

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




The Examiner Newspaper







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...