News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Don't let forestry die: industry 

Don't let forestry die: industry

12 Feb, 2012 03:00 AM
FEAR and regret were the main reactions from forestry heavyweights to Friday's Tasmanian Forests Intergovernmental Agreement funding announcement which saw $9.65 million go to agriculture and aquaculture.

On Friday, Premier Lara Giddings announced $3.9 million from the agreement would be invested into aquaculture in Southern Tasmania and $5.75 million into two agricultural projects at Circular Head.

The money was part of $120 million that was put aside to be used for regional assistance to diversify Tasmania's economy and create jobs, specifically with the aim of providing jobs for displaced forestry workers.

Forest industry representatives yesterday said they had mixed feelings towards the deals, fearing agriculture and aquaculture could be seen as replacements to the ailing forestry sector, resulting in a ``let it die'' attitude toward their own industry.

The major announcement on Friday was the $4.25 million Agritas Trade College to be built at Smithton, which will offer training in all aspects of agriculture with particular focus expected to centre on the North-West's rapidly growing dairy industry.

Forests and Forest Industry Council of Tasmania chairman Glenn Britton, a Circular Head sawmill operator, said he supported the projects and acknowledged they would help the regions but did not want people to look at them as replacements for a forestry industry in turmoil.

``The industry is under tremendous strain,'' Mr Britton said.

``(But) with appropriate support we can maintain jobs in the industry.''

Timber Communities Australia spokesman Barry Chipman also supported the projects and said it was good that the state government had recognised the need to help communities affected.

But he said the forestry industry shouldn't have reached this point.

``I don't know if politicians are fully aware of the heartache in regional communities,'' Mr Chipman said.

``There's far too many forest industry-dependent families that have had their livelihoods taken away from them.''

Mr Britton said some of the assistance money should be directed at maintaining and strengthening forestry.

``A reasonable portion should fund viable forest projects to underpin the industry's future.''

Mr Britton said he didn't want to see apathy or a ``let it die'' attitude from politicians towards the industry.

``We don't want these industries to take its place, we want it to be in addition to the industry.''

He said jobs created by other industries were not, and should not be looked at as replacements for forest industry workers.

``A lot of people in the forest industry are not suited to work in other industries, such as dairy as an example.''

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Evolve or die out. Stop sooking and start seeking opportunity. Sick and tired of hearing whinges and whines coming from forestry.
Posted by Darwin, 12/02/2012 10:46:52 AM, on The Examiner
Again the forestry industry with its hand out for even more taxpayers money. Enough is enough - if you can't make a profit without my taxes propping you up, it is definitely time to "let it die".
Posted by Gary, 12/02/2012 10:52:24 AM, on The Examiner
Mr Britton the politicians aren't apathetic towards the industry - they've finally HEARD that the rest of us taxpayers are sick of supporting it with endless handouts ...

We can't afford it !

Posted by enough is enough, 12/02/2012 11:00:26 AM, on The Examiner
money well spent for a change and not having all your eggs in one basket like we have in the past .
Posted by tas, 12/02/2012 11:04:40 AM, on The Examiner
Why are "a lot of people in forestry not suited to work in other occupations, such as dairying?"

What does Mr Britton mean by this?


Posted by Anne Cadwallader, 12/02/2012 11:27:10 AM, on The Examiner
It is great to see the overall plan to expand non-forest industries.

These assisted industries should certainly be seen as replacements for parts of the existing forest businesses.

I hope that the government rigourously attempts to fill the newly created jobs with redundant forestry workers.

If they do not attempt this they will have failed in their aim of reducing forestry businesses substantially. They will have also failed in their promised assistance to forest industry workers.


Posted by brian of tamar valley, 12/02/2012 12:02:24 PM, on The Examiner
NO more money for forestry. Wasting Tasmanian tax dollars on this industry is the reason Tasmania is in the mess it's in.

Tasmania can no longer be a one industry state.

We need to build real industries that bring money into the state. Not spend our tax dollars meant for hospitals and schools.

Ask the nurses and teachers about the funding cuts, that money went to Gunns.

Posted by mirrorman, 12/02/2012 1:18:11 PM, on The Examiner
What, does the industry want more handouts? While FT is still logging HCV? While Artec is still coming in the back door, after Gunns have left it?

``A lot of people in the forest industry are not suited to work in other industries, such as dairy as an example.''

This is what retraining is about. This is it. Barry Chipman is dong it. He has been cut to one day a week from the TCA ('Forest Protection Society' - what a joke) Now he's working in a retail store the other four days.


Posted by Garry Stannus, 12/02/2012 1:50:32 PM, on The Examiner
God Save our Forest Industry for it is as clear as day this Green/Labor government wont! Now that enviomentalists and the Greens have got their way and have mostly destroyed Forestry Tas, they will just move on to the next project and seek to bring about the destruction of this industry or that industry. They happily walk away from the ruins of lives and families that they are responsible for and they don't care! They don't care that people are out of work, they don't care that viable industries are closing down, they don't care for people at all. God protect us from the Greens!
Posted by marsyll, 12/02/2012 2:19:27 PM, on The Examiner
Over a billion dollars have been given to this industry with no indication that they will ever stand on their own feet. Enough is enough and to rub salt into the poor tax payers wounds the industry is destroying it’s long term viability by clear felling regrowth stands of timber for peeler billets for little or no return.
Posted by max, 12/02/2012 2:25:49 PM, on The Examiner
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




The Examiner Newspaper







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...