News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Activists refused admission to North-East piggery 

Activists refused admission to North-East piggery

02 Dec, 2009 05:12 PM
FORTY-FOUR animal activists from around Australia were yesterday refused admission to do what they described as a spot inspection of a North-East piggery.

Animal activist and group spokeswoman Emma Haswell said that the group wanted to perform a spot inspection on the piggery because of concerns for the conditions under which the pigs were being kept.

"We'd all had foot baths, had our temperatures taken and were wearing bio-suits to ensure we posed no risk to the animals," she said.

"Animal Liberation NSW president Mark Pearson introduced himself to the farmer who refused to give his permission for a spot inspection, saying we should return in 24 hours.

"A lot of people don't realise the conditions these animals - considered by scientists to be as intelligent as a four-year-old child - live in.

"They spend much of their lives in steel and concrete crates the size of their bodies."

Tasmanian Island Pork Alliance coordinator Malcolm Cowan would not identify the farmer and said that only RSPCA or Primary Industries officials had the power to request spot inspections.

All Tasmanian piggeries operated within the industry code of practice, he said.

"The code is currently before the Animal Advisory Committee for review," Mr Cowan said.

"Pig farmers are subject to random audits from DPIW and RSPCA officers and there is a third party audited element in our quality assurance program."

But Ms Haswell said that the code of practice over-ruled the Animal Welfare Act which forbade the confining of animals without provision for exercise.

"The code of practice for the welfare of pigs was written by industry and the government and recommends keeping pigs, one of the world's most intelligent animals, in a crate 2m long and 60cm wide," she said.

"Changes being sought will make it even more difficult to prosecute pig farmers - (Primary Industries Minister) David Llewellyn has not yet implemented the new code and we're asking him not to."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
well done to emma haswell and her committed colleagues. these are wonderful animals and the general public need to be made aware of the horrible conditions under which they are forced to exist.
Posted by jack, 2/12/2009 11:22:08 AM, on The Examiner
Out Pipers River way, there is a farm which has pigs roaming free in paddocks and treated extremely well, and sold commercially, if they can do it, why can't others?
Posted by Trudystar, 2/12/2009 11:40:43 AM, on The Examiner
Well done Animal Lib ! Those ignorant people saying that rspca inspectors can do random inspections are lying !That’s a load of BS ! RSPCA inspectors have to give three days notice before they can inspector those horror factories ! Keep doing the best you can AL, save as many as you can ! Its people/groups like you that actual get off their ass and bring about a change !
Posted by Ban Factory Farms !!!!, 2/12/2009 1:31:26 PM, on The Examiner
If the RSPCA did what we expect of them, there would be no need for this great movement: Against Animal Cruelty. Random inspections should be the norm - if they were, I'm sure the animals would get a far better deal. Or would they? There seems to be a strong protection racket involved in the factory farming industry and it's not going to stop unless we, as consumers, just make sure these businesses aren't viable. If you must eat pork products, only buy free range - and make sure that any claims to 'free range' can be verified. There was some interesting coverage of factory piggeries last week on one of the commercial channels last week. The Pork Board was really lambasted and it was revealed that one of the board members was involved in the industry. Wish Emma Haswell was on that Board then we might see some changes!
Posted by Maddie, 2/12/2009 5:29:12 PM, on The Examiner
Whilst I prefer free range anything over battery farms what did these pretentious drama queens expect ? If a mob of 44 professional agitators showed up at my place demanding to inspect the conditions my Bantams were kept in I`d say something very rude and pugnacious to them . On the other hand , if a R.S.P.C.A. official wanted to inspect them I`d say "go right ahead mate , just watch out for the cranky little black hen" If they wanted to draw attention to the plight of battery/factory farmed animals why not spend some money on a T.V. ad campaign or organise some signatures on a petition to be delivered to parliament . But then they wouldn`t get to be the center of attention by making a nuisance of themselves would they ?
Posted by Waylander, 2/12/2009 7:32:47 PM, on The Examiner
I would like to correct a point raised previously; the RSPCA does have the authority to make random inspections of any business that involves animals. They asked for the ability to do this in 2007 (which required special permission from the minister) and in 07/08 they made 187 unannounced visits of such businesses and DPIWE inspectors made a further 9 inspections. On top of this the RSPCA investigated over 3300 complaints of animal cruelty and made a total of 7100 visits to premises under investigation. They do this with just 8 inspectors; 3 years ago there were just 3 inspectors. The state government gives them $195,000 per year in total for the provision of 3 inspectors that they believe can do all of the necessary work and the RSPCA in recent years has used funds raised by the public to employ, equip and train more inspectors. Instead of people criticizing the RSPCA endlessly they should find out this information which is freely available and then consider if they are really criticizing the right people; surely the state government is where the anger should be directed for it's poor support of animal welfare.
Posted by am i the only sensible one?, 2/12/2009 8:45:37 PM, on The Examiner
Of course they were turned away. Who cares if they took all safety precautions? This is private property. Did they really expect to be let in? Do they think they have the same rights of access to our homes unannounced even if they 'promise to take our shoes off so we don't spoil the carpet'. These folks are so silly and unreasonable and they damage the reputation of other greenies and animal lovers like me who live in the real world and try and change it using the laws of the land and not by the rules of vigilantism. Emma Haswell should run for public office if she wants to really change things for animals instead of dressing in silly costumes leading her merry band of the great unwashed.
Posted by Doug, 2/12/2009 8:56:48 PM, on The Examiner
Once again there seems to be a manipulation of facts to allow for a sensational story.The pens referred to that are 2m long and 60cm wide that are used on piggeries are called farrowing pens. Does anyone actually understand why the sows are placed in these pens? Or that the sows are in these small pens for a short period?
Posted by Racket, 3/12/2009 1:16:54 AM, on The Examiner
The all those who oppose factory farming of any animal don't buy it. The market responds to consumer dollars. If you won't buy it they can't sell it. The supermarket who stops selling cage produced eggs for instance will have an easy advantage over its competitors. If you ask for free range bacon and ham the message will get through. They may not care about the animals but they care about the profits and their adsvertising image.
Posted by Jo, 3/12/2009 1:14:57 PM, on The Examiner
People, I will say it again so hopefully it will register. RSPCA have to give 3 days notice before they inspect these horror factories ! Most pigs aren't lucky enough to live on old-fashioned farms like "Babe". Most are kept in sheds on concrete floors, surrounded by metal bars. Pregnant pigs are kept for their entire 4 month pregnancy in a tiny metal stall not much bigger than the size of their bodies called a sow stall. Nursing mothers are similarly confined. Unable to interact with their babies and make nests for them and they watch helplessly as their piglets have their tails cut off and teeth clipped without pain relief. Male piglets are castrated without anaesthetic. If they had nothing to hid or be ashamed of they would have let them in !
Posted by Ban Factory Farms !!!!, 3/12/2009 2:08:05 PM, on The Examiner
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Activists try to conduct a spot inspection on a North-East piggery yesterday.Picture: CONTRIBUTED
Activists try to conduct a spot inspection on a North-East piggery yesterday.Picture: CONTRIBUTED

Most popular articles


Download The Examiner iPhone App


The Examiner Newspaper







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...