News 
 Local News 
 News 
 Environment 
 Water issues are a tourism headache 

Water issues are a tourism headache

01 Mar, 2010 11:44 AM
TOXIC water concerns need to be dealt with immediately before they do any more damage to Tasmania's reputation, tourism figures warned yesterday.

It came as the Greens announced they would fund an independent water quality commissioner to rebuild people's confidence in their drinking water.

There have been chemicals detected in Tasmania's rivers 130 times since 2005.

Tourism Industry Council Tasmania chief executive Daniel Hanna said controversy over the water at St Helens had "absolutely" had an impact on the perception of Tasmania.

Mr Hanna said St Helens tourism operators confirmed they had seen some cancellations in the past week, but he said the impact had not been significant so far.

He said the sooner there was some evidence either way on toxic water concerns, the sooner the state could deal with any issues and move on.

St Helens general practitioner Alison Bleaney recently said she believed toxins from the leaves of plantation Eucalyptus nitens have been making residents of the East Coast sick.

Primary Industries and Water Minister David Llewellyn said the state already had an establised environmental protection authority, a well- respected director of pubic health and nationally accredited chemical testing laboratories.

He added that the state had a water policy that a recent review confirmed as being an effective tool in water quality management and which had led to significant improvements in management.

The State Government has said it would install carbon powder filters in the St Helens water supply.

Director of Public Health Roscoe Taylor has said there was no evidence to show that St Helens drinking water was unsafe but is seeking comprehensive testing from Dr Fiona Young, of Flinders University, who carried out tests for Dr Bleaney.

Greens leader Nick McKim said Tasmanians had lost confidence in the Government's capacity to properly monitor the state's waterways.

"Tasmanians have a right to clean, chemical- free drinking water," he said.

"The Greens will deliver this by creating a state water quality commissioner who is truly independent of government."

Under the Greens' plan, the commissioner would:

Carry out water testing.

Make recommendations about water infrastructure.

Prepare prosecution briefs of any breach of the Greens' chemical trespass legislation.

Liberal leader Will Hodgman said his party had already committed $950,000 to improve water quality testing, as well as to conduct an independent investigation of the concerns at St Helens.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
So it is not a serious public health issue, it is a tourism problem. I get it. Now it also makes sense when the minister responsible says: “the state had a water policy .. being an effective tool in water quality management and which had led to significant improvements in management”. Significant improvements in management? WTF is he on? I am so confident now that the water I drink is clean thanks to this genius. Gather this also means that the state can effectively manage polluted water by pointing out what a huge issue this is for tourists. Go figure!
Posted by WTF, 1/03/2010 10:50:07 AM, on The Examiner
Trust us, we are green, and we have no interest in attacking forestry. We will waste money setting up water testing, because we know what we are doing, just like Garrett. I guess we all know who the good Dr will be voting for. Would The Examiner care to tell us what those 130 chemicals found in the water was? I note the absence of the word "toxic" in that sentence. So the Greens will fine companies if toxins are found, as these toxins are causing cancer (according to the good Dr) how will fines help? Shouldn't they be shutting down all the plantations or shutting down the towns? Create a situation,spin it to your advantage,wreak havoc,who cares?
Posted by Noelene, 1/03/2010 10:52:44 AM, on The Examiner
I would like to express my concern about many comments on the water issue which seem to be more concerned about the financial losses flowing from contaminated drinking water, than the danger to human life! Worryingly such comments are coming from senior government, council and public service figures. It suggests a profoundly immoral culture within the government and the public service..
Posted by KAS, 1/03/2010 11:50:56 AM, on The Examiner
Primary Industries and Water Minister David Llewellyn said the state already had an established environmental protection authority, a well- respected director of pubic health and nationally accredited chemical testing laboratories. He added that the state had a water policy that a recent review confirmed as being an effective tool in water quality management and which had led to significant improvements in management. My question’s are what have they been doing, why have we got toxins in the water, what is being done about plantations being established in water catchments and the necessity of spraying in these catchments and finally if the system is so good why did a doctor have so little faith that she thought it necessary to do her own research.
Posted by max, 1/03/2010 12:07:09 PM, on The Examiner
I would be interested to know what environment minster, David Llewelyn's Director of Pubic health has to do with Saint Helens water supply!
Posted by keith, 1/03/2010 12:34:25 PM, on The Examiner
In response to Keith, The Director of Public Health, Dr. Roscoe Taylor is the public official who has given iron-clad, absolute guarantees that the St Helen's drink water is totally safe. The question is, has he ever had sufficient evidence to make such guarantees?
Posted by KAS, 1/03/2010 2:45:15 PM, on The Examiner
Expert scientist and professional public servants are currently responsible for the testing of our water both in our catchments and for drinking. These Tasmanians carry out their duties in a completely open and transparent way, and political parties such as the greens belittle them when they claim to be replaced with a more 'independent' commissioner. Yet despite a full program of water testing for pesticides in our water carried out quarterly at 55 sites, these dedicated Tasmanians have only found trace detections of pesticides, none have got any where near the health value set by the Commonwealth for drinking water standards. The same Tasmanians investigates all detections, especially when the green politicians carry on in a media beat up. A look at the internet site of the DPIWE, the EPA and the Department of Health services shows that they continually report these results and publish reports that demonstrate that our drinking water meets all the criteria set by medical experts to ensure that it is safe. Without comparing the 130 detections with the independently set health values this campaign is purely political.
Posted by kraft, 1/03/2010 7:58:21 PM, on The Examiner
open and transparent testing by independent experts is required immediatly forget the politics the general plubic and Tasmania's credibility is at risk it is pretty obvious that the current water management structure has failed and remember this outcry is only about St Helens water supply how do we know if testing to the same degree is performed in other areas similar results may become evident only thorough testing will tell.
Posted by monty, 2/03/2010 11:56:13 AM, on The Examiner

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




The Examiner Newspaper







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...