News 
 Local News 
 News 
 Environment 
 Plantation `concerns but not evidence' 

Plantation `concerns but not evidence'

12 Mar, 2010 07:28 AM
TASMANIA'S Director of Public Health has admitted private concerns about monoculture tree plantations but says there is still no reliable evidence to link them to health risks.

Dr Roscoe Taylor yesterday addressed a forum, organised by community group Our Common Ground, in response to the St Helens water issue and claims that drinking water could be unsafe because of toxicity associated with Eucalyptus nitens plantations.

Dr Taylor said he had no control over catchment practices but admitted he had personal concerns about monoculture plantations and managed investment schemes.

Dr Wynne Russell, the author of the Environment Tasmania forestry white paper Levelling the Playing Field, said that there had been great improvements in the forestry industry but governance issues still needed to be addressed.

"It's not clear that forestry bodies have in any way failed ... but (the level of public concern) is indicative of when a sector has a history of being associated with bad governance," Dr Russell said.

Days after an expert independent panel was established to investigate the St Helens issue, Dr Taylor said that first test results showed that no eucalyptus compounds were found in the George River - St Helens' drinking water supply - either at the intake point or upstream of forestry activity.

Dr Taylor said that over the next 12 months there would be a full audit of all drinking water management plans.

Also yesterday, members of Launceston's Wilderness Action Group created an art- activist event in the Brisbane Street Mall to draw attention to water issues in the state.

A group of green statues represented different sections of society to express concern about the use of pesticides and large monoculture plantations.

The action group will also take part in an open-air water forum on Sunday in Launceston's Civic Square, starting at 1pm, with speakers including Lilydale Protection Group spokeswoman Margy Dockray and freshwater crayfish expert Todd Walsh.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
People have been asking for comprehensive water testing for over ten years, I don’t need any evidence either to be concerned about Taylor.
Posted by WTF, 12/03/2010 9:01:19 AM, on The Examiner
I think they shouldn't grow plantations near towns drinking supplys because chemicals will go into the river and people will become ill
Posted by Jz, 12/03/2010 9:28:54 AM, on The Examiner
I think stunts like that pulled yesterday by the so called Wilderness Protection Group are doing more damage to the clean green image of Tasmania than any amount of chemicals that could ever be poured directly into our town water supplies. An independent panel of experts has been set up to investigate this matter and we should all await its findings before racing to disparage Tassies environmental credentials.
Posted by Harry, 12/03/2010 10:08:32 AM, on The Examiner
JZ, if you do not want plantations in these areas, we had better stop cropping, grazing and urbanisation as well, these activities have a far more substantial impact on water quality. You only need to look at how many cattle are directly extreting into the water systems within any town water catchment. About 2% of chemical use is attributed to forestry, I wonder where the remainder goes?
Posted by Jason, 12/03/2010 10:31:59 AM, on The Examiner
The Labor and Liberal party did not protect us from Asbestos - thousands died and nobody was ever subjected to criminal charges! You can expect the same on the water issue. Labor and Liberal will put the profits of the forestry industry ahead of public safety, just like they did with Asbestos.
Posted by KAS, 12/03/2010 11:09:19 AM, on The Examiner
Some comments here seem to ignore the fact that our drinking water and our waterways our regularly tested. When the allegations were first raised that pesticides were causing toxicity at St Helens, the government immediately reacted and investigated. Even the ABC had an onscreen statement during their show stating that Government tests had found toxicity caused not by pesticides but by organic compounds. This toxicity was restricted to the raw water and not to the drinking water that was clear. The organic compounds were found in water taken in pristine environments and also downstream of farming and forestry. Amazingly Dr Scammell's samples did not include any from pristine areas, so there is no "control". Until there is this is nothing more than a theory. Importantly the latest tests show the Drinking water is safe to drink.
Posted by kraft, 12/03/2010 4:48:13 PM, on The Examiner

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Launceston's Wilderness Action Group member Lisa Searle (with baby) during an event highlighting water issues in the Brisbane Street Mall yesterday. Picture: PHILLIP BIGGS
Launceston's Wilderness Action Group member Lisa Searle (with baby) during an event highlighting water issues in the Brisbane Street Mall yesterday. Picture: PHILLIP BIGGS

Most popular articles




The Examiner Newspaper







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...