News 
 Local News 
 News 
 Environment 
 Forest groups unable to make contact 

Forest groups unable to make contact

17 Jan, 2012 03:00 AM

THOSE on both sides of the forestry debate yesterday vied for the attention of Prime Minister Julia Gillard, but with little success.

Environment groups gathered outside one of her meetings in Hobart to protest over Friday's agreement that allows logging in forests that were earmarked for interim protection under the $276 million state-federal deal.

Meanwhile, timber processor Ta Ann sought a meeting with Ms Gillard on public comments being made about its forestry operations.

Company spokesman Alan Ashbarry said a meeting with Ms Gillard's staff had been positive.

Ms Gillard said she expected all parties to await the outcome of a verification process of 572,000 hectares of forest being carried out by Professor Jonathan West.

That detailed report on the high conservation values within the forests, and the wood supply needs of the industry, is due by the end of next month.

``I do expect people who have been in that process every step of the way to hold to the process that they agreed to,'' Ms Gillard said yesterday.

She insisted that the state and federal governments had only stepped in as a response to the so-called peace talks between industry and environment interests.

Those stakeholders are due to meet on Thursday - their first meeting for the year.

Environment groups are insisting that Ms Gillard and her state counterpart have failed to uphold their own agreement by allowing 1950 hectares to be logged within 430,000 hectares that was written into the original deal for interim protection.

The Greens have also been highly critical of the conservation agreement, saying that industry should have been compensated instead of being allowed to log those areas.

``All the Prime Minister is being asked to do is to stick to her word,'' Tasmanian Greens acting leader Tim Morris said.

Tasmanian Country Sawmillers Federation chairman Fred Ralph said everyone should sit back and await the details in Professor West's report, which would help to determine what forests could be protected. ``We don't know what the facts are yet,'' he said.

Acting Premier Bryan Green met Ms Gillard yesterday but would not comment on their discussions.

He described the meeting as constructive and ``an opportunity to discuss our shared agenda for 2012''.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Ha!

Forest Agreement smultz.

There will never be a true agreement unless the contributors can be trusted.

Who can trust a politician?

But they have the audacity to question the integrity of the others.

If we wait long enough, the whole industry will implode, with the main losers being those Shylock finance companies who foisted their loan offers onto the witless log truck operators who couldn't see past the nose on their face.

Can someone find a new story to turn out attention to please.

Posted by Jezzabelle, 17/01/2012 7:20:43 AM, on The Examiner
Surprise surprise !
Posted by PB, 17/01/2012 7:37:55 AM, on The Examiner
It is not surprising that the PM declined to meet with Ta Ann. This plant is on the nose - hence the lost London Olympic contracts.
Posted by TamarValleyEnvironmentCentre, 17/01/2012 10:43:15 AM, on The Examiner
@ TamarValleyEnvironmentCentre.....what next.?..ban icecreams because they have wooden sticks..
Posted by mic, 17/01/2012 12:56:54 PM, on The Examiner
@mic - yes, if the sticks come from high conservation value forests.
Posted by TamarValleyEnvironmentCentre, 17/01/2012 1:21:39 PM, on The Examiner
exactly how much more money are the taxpayers to put into this destructive industry when essential services like health and education are facing cutbacks ? enough is enough tell the loggers to get out of our forests and get on their bikes and get themselves a real job that doesn't entail bleeding taxpayers dry.
Posted by ben, 17/01/2012 1:27:44 PM, on The Examiner
mic. I suspect what is next is more of the same which will ultimately see the end of forestry in Australia and increased dependence on imported timber from someone else's backyard. We already import more sawn timber, more engineered wood products, more pulp and paper than we export. The green movement does not look at the big picture and the negative environmental implications of their actions. They simply stick to their version of environmentalism (which has little to do with reality or minimising environmental impacts).
Posted by oh well, 17/01/2012 1:45:41 PM, on The Examiner
Well oh well. If we import more timber products than we export. Why do we export.

Would it be that our own timber products are not competitive.

Posted by mirrorman, 17/01/2012 4:07:24 PM, on The Examiner
@TamarValleyEnvironmentCentre please define 'high conservation value forests'.

Please also advise where I need to look for them as I am struggling to see the high conservation value forests for the regrowth trees.

Posted by Jen, 17/01/2012 4:48:22 PM, on The Examiner
@ tamar valley enviroment centre then what ban building homes and schools and hospitals??
Posted by matt ex tassie, 17/01/2012 7:20:02 PM, on The Examiner

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Tasmanian Greens acting leader Tim Morris
Tasmanian Greens acting leader Tim Morris

Most popular articles




The Examiner Newspaper







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...