News 
 Local News 
 News 
 Economy, Business, IT & Finance 
 Gunns commits to plantation wood for Bell Bay pulp mill 

Gunns commits to plantation wood for Bell Bay pulp mill

06 Jan, 2010 03:30 PM
GUNNS' proposed $2.5 billion Bell Bay pulp mill would begin operation with 100 per cent plantation timber, the company said today.

In a statement to the Australian Securities Exchange, Gunns chairman John Gay said the successful acquisition of access to the pulpwood resource of failed managed investment scheme company Great Southern had secured necessary plantation timber for the mill.

Mr Gay said discussions with equity partners and bankers for the controversial project were "continuing positively".

Gunns yesterday became the responsible entity for nine former Great Southern managed investment schemes, representing more than 40,000 hectares of plantaion pulpwood in the Green Triangle area of Victoria and South Australia.

"The Bell Bay mill has always been planned and designed as a plantation based mill," Mr Gay said.

"However, with Gunns' existing resources, it was not possible for Gunns to guarantee supply to the mill of 100 per cent plantation timber until five years after commencement of mill operations.

"Securing the Great Southern resource is an exciting new development for Gunns that allows us to accelerate our plantation strategy to supply the Bell Bay mill with 100 per cent plantation from mill start-up," Mr Gay said.

"Operation of the mill on 100 per cent plantation from commencement will ensure that this project is fully consistent with other modern bleached kraft pulp mills in South America that operate on 100 per cent plantation supply, and this decision should mitigate any concerns of stakeholders regarding fibre supply to the Bell Bay mill."

Mr Gay said the decision would also further enhance managed investment schemes and other private growers by providing certainty for their resource into the future.

He said Gunns looked forward to working with non-government organisations, the State Government and other stakeholders in relation to this new development for the Bell Bay project.

The Wilderness Society has decribed the Gunns’ announcement as a step in the right direction but warned that the destruction of Tasmania’s native forests was set to continue unless further steps were taken.

"For this announcement to be genuine Gunns needs to commit to the protection of native forests in Tasmania and renegotiate the pulp mill wood supply deal with Forestry Tasmania to exclude any native forest woodchips," a spokesman said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
This is great news! A modern pulp mill operating under the most stringent environmental conditions usiing 100% plantation timber. This is the win win situation the Wilderness Society has been seeking and promoting on its website. Surely they must must now come out and support this project? If they don't, then we can only assume they are in the business of perpetuating conflict rather than seeking ways to resolve it.
Posted by Harry, 6/01/2010 10:44:59 AM
The water consumption from these super-sucker breed of trees is quite a concern. If numerous relatively-drought stricken years are ahead, we can't expect the mill to stop operating. The NE Tas needs every drop it can get, these days, for farming communities to keep going. So much of the water here is groundwater flowing just under the surface, that these plantation trees, in their early years particularly, suck like mad. Send the mill to the NW at Hampshire.
Posted by Jason Anders, 6/01/2010 11:38:39 AM
This changes nothing as regards the filthy, rotten mill, with it's pollutants endangering Tasmanians and it's thirsty use of vast quantities of clean drinking water . . . The mill must go....and I don't mean "go ahead". It is unsustainable on many fronts.
Posted by brian, 6/01/2010 11:49:49 AM
The only thing that will be endangered by the mill going ahead will be the increasingly desperate & exaggerated arguments of its main opponents. Australia's Chief Scientist has said the mill will have a neutral environmental impact - and that was before today's announcement that it will no longer use native forests. Why should we ever listen to people like Brian? No amount of rational argument or compromise will ever satisfy people like him.
Posted by Harry, 6/01/2010 12:08:05 PM
Wake up 'Harry" - what is your connection with Gunns? So whilst it is not viable to build the mill at Hampshire it now makes economic sense to ship timber from the mainland? Has the chlorine treatment gone away? Is Gunns any less toxic to financiers? Nothing has changed as Gunns fails once again to achieve anything of real substance.
Posted by Igor Jones, 6/01/2010 12:09:53 PM
I agree with comments made by Jason and Brian regarding the consumption of megalitres of water that our state just does not have in abundance now (if it ever did have). Additionally, Harry has not considered current objections to the pollution of our waterways and air. This is NOT a single-issue argument to be overcome so easily, as Harry would have us all lbelieve.
Posted by taj, 6/01/2010 12:20:55 PM
Jason is partly on the right track. There are certainly some suckers around, if not super-suckers! So many people are sucked in by the Green rhetoric and unsubstantiated scare mongering that is bandied around in the media by people who are either against this mill, or just against the proponent. No matter what facts are presented they'll be twisted or simply ignored in order to advance the negative cause. As Harry points out, this "filthy, rotten mill" has been described by Australia's chief scientist as being environmentally neutral - what would he know? The Elemental Chlorine Free process is used in pulpmills around the world with no ill effects. Are the laws of physics somehow different here than anywhere else? No doubt we will be subject rantings along those lines soon, just wait and see !
Posted by Baz, 6/01/2010 1:12:18 PM
Harry, past-Chief Scientist, Jim Peacock, did voice concerns regarding 72 swimming pools per day of dioxin-contaminated effluent staying predominantly within 5km of the Tas coastline i.e. outside his Commonwealth waters area of consideration to which I think his "environmentally neutral" overall summary conclusion actually referred. It's the State assessment where the bogies lie ant that assessment was fast-tracked for what seem now to have been very spurious reasons, especially in light of revelations of what the RPDC thought of the proposal immediately prior to it being yanked away from their consideration, i.e. that it was critically non-compliant with the guidelines, particularly with regard to fugitive odour emissions lingering in the Tamar just like the present bushfire smoke from the York Town fire.
Posted by Sam Jacobs, 6/01/2010 1:58:55 PM
Yesterday we saw a great example with the smoke from the Yorktown fire, of how the Tamar Valley naturally 'funnels' air, and anything in it, down the valley where it hangs over Launceston. Imagine the air if this pulp mill goes ahead? As well as the huge amount of precious water used, then the effluent pumped out to sea, and the chlorine, the increase in log trucks on roads and in towns. To be 100% plantation wood should be a minumum requirement, but to bring it from interstate is a joke. This pulp mill could (possibly) be an amazing example of the way of the future if all these issues were rectified. Hell, why not even make the pulp into paper at the Burnie Paper Mills and truly make Tasmania a better place and put it on the map!
Posted by missalex, 6/01/2010 2:25:33 PM
What about the impact on agriculatural land of conversion to plantations, impacts on hydrology and groundwater, none of which were in the IIS?
Posted by Miles Ellis, 6/01/2010 2:48:42 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
The site of Gunns' proposed Bell Bay pulp mill.
The site of Gunns' proposed Bell Bay pulp mill.

Most popular articles

Election Notice
Randstad Pty Ltd
 
Esk Property
 
Devonport City Promotions
 
Stevenson Audi
 
Buy Locally
 
Competition
 
How to book a classifieds advert
 
Launceston & Surrounds B&C Directory Ad
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...