News 
 Local News 
 News 
 Crime and Law 
 Mental health ward of woe 

Mental health ward of woe

28 Aug, 2010 09:57 AM
SENIOR medical staff have revealed serious issues continue to plague Launceston's mental health ward even after years of allegations and investigations, some prompted by patient deaths.

Less than 12 months ago Health Minister Lara Giddings announced the troubled ward's new name, Northside, represented ``a cultural change'' and ``a new era for mental health in the North''.

However, an ongoing inquest in Launceston into the 2008 suicide of 22-year-old Ward 1E in-patient Claire Waugh yesterday heard revealing testimonies prompted by Coroner Rod Chandler's own questions.

Revelations included:

The state government had cut the facility's funding since Ms Waugh's death, causing the February loss of one of the ward's only two doctors.

Northside's clinical director revealed psychiatric best-practice patient-to-doctor-ratios was considered to be one registrar to a maximum of seven psychiatric in-patients. Northside has a 20-patient capacity and one doctor.

A simple structural design-related flaw in patient rooms remains unchanged 2sfr1/2 years after Ms Waugh utilised that design factor to kill herself.

(The Examiner is not reporting details of the flaw).

A wire fence remains the only barrier between the facility's courtyard and a public, easily accessible Launceston General Hospital walkway, despite it

being the subject of serious safety concerns for several years.

One senior LGH employee made a statement to the inquest in which he described watching from his upper-level office as patients and outsiders appeared to be ``trafficking in drugs'' through the fence.

A senior psychiatric nurse revealed the ward's rescue resuscitation pack was not in working order at the crucial time on the night of January 9, 2008, when Ms Waugh was found on the floor of her room.

``Maybe the mask was not attached to the tubing .th.th. or something like that ... that was required to give the oxygen to the patient,'' she told the court yesterday.

She was unable to administer the oxygen to Ms Waugh and the LGH's own specialist emergency response team had arrived by the time she returned with a different oxygen bottle.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Yes it was 5 years ago that i made submissions to government after problems at then ward 1e and nothing was done then and as the article says conditions are probably worse now.I have 2 children with bi polar disorder and they need regular support from mental health.The last time my daughter went to northside she was subjected to 5 hours wait in the casualty admission area in a manic state.That is not good for her or the other people suffering there. Why it takes so long to send the registrar from one end of the hospital to the other is beyond me. Every other mental hospital in the country admits people with a sense of urgency straight into the ward. My son has been on many occasions wrongly locked u[p in the solitary cell.He has never been a danger to anyone or himself . It is time to do something in this country i call mine and am becoming embarrased about the lack of health care as we used to know it. I have had better service at reasonable rate in Vietnam and Thailand - both supposedly poorer countries than ours. Where do our taxes go?
Posted by stormie, 28/08/2010 3:56:04 PM, on The Examiner
i have been in ward 1e myself before and the things i saw going on with other patientce were wrong. I would escape before the door was locked @ 8 o'clock because i had had enough of being in there.
Posted by mandy, 12/09/2010 9:42:47 AM, on The Examiner
Stormie, I agree that the emergency department at the LGH has far too long waiting time but I can not agree with any other statement that you have made. How can you say that your son was locked up in the solitary cell? If you are going to make statements like this please get your facts right, there is no solitary cell at the LGH, there is an area where at risk patients are nursed and managed in a safer environment. Patients are nursed in this area only after being accessed, if the staff feels there is a threat to the patient, other patients or themselves they will utilise the facilities. Staff at the LGH should be able to work in a safe environment as it is law that workers have this. I even have my doubts that your letter is real and if it is real you should start accepting a few things that you would have been told about these illnesses.
Posted by Gary, 23/09/2010 2:39:24 PM, on The Examiner

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


Download The Examiner iPhone App


The Examiner Newspaper







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...