News 
 Local News 
 News 
 Business 
 Pulp mill approval doubt 

Pulp mill approval doubt

12 May, 2009 07:22 AM
PREMIER David Bartlett has told Gunns to build its $2.2 billion Bell Bay pulp mill without delay - scoffing at a legal opinion that casts doubt on the validity of the project's approval.

In a soon-to-be-published book about the country's environmental impact assessments, University of Tasmania law lecturer Michael Stokes says the parliamentary approval was questionable because an independent expert report by Sweco Pic was incomplete.

Mr Stokes said yesterday that he had spent 15 months investigating various legal aspects of the approval, which was rushed through by former Premier Paul Lennon after Gunns withdrew from the independent Resource Planning and Development Commission assessment.

"Under the Pulp Mill Assessment Act, the consultant had to report that the mill could proceed and Parliament had to vote on its approval but it seems to me we didn't have a proper recommendation from the consultant," Mr Stokes said.

"If you look at Sweco Pic's assessment, they are quite open about the fact that they didn't assess against all of the criteria."

Gunns labelled Mr Stokes's findings "ridiculous".

Mr Bartlett said the Solicitor- General gave advice on the matter before the vote and he did not believe there was any legal confusion.

"I tell you what, we need that pulp mill now, we need the jobs it will bring, we need the investment it will bring," Mr Bartlett said.

"My message to (Gunns) today is to get on with it."

Opposition Leader Will Hodgman also reiterated the Liberal Party's support for the project.

"We want to see this project get up and running, not a continued stream of internal naval-gazing," Mr Hodgman said.

Greens leader Nick McKim said Mr Stokes's findings sent a clear message that the project was fraught with danger, but the party would not be taking court action to prevent construction.

Wilderness Society campaign director Vica Bayley said Mr Stokes's legal view added to the uncertainty surrounding the project.

Australian Greens leader Bob Brown said building the mill "would not only be environmentally irresponsible and socially unpopular, it would clearly be illegal".

Gunns managing director John Gay is understood to be overseas as the company battles to find a joint venture equity partner before the end of next month.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
This quote appears in the story above: "My message to (Gunns) today is to get on with it," said David Bartlett. This quote is from the same person who said that he would give no more aid or assistance to Gunns concerning the potential pulp mill. Now what do we believe?
Posted by Buck and Joan Emberg, 12/05/2009 9:18:17 AM
Come off it how does that comment relate to Government interference or additional aid or assistance? For people who claim to be interested in the Tamar Valley community why do we only hear you in relation to the pulp mill and conspiracy and not when equally important issues are raised?
Posted by Wally the worker, 12/05/2009 10:39:47 AM
Amazing that a State Premier is encouraging a project that may be illegally approved...reminds me of Lennon. Surely we need to be sure that all legal aspects are correct!
Posted by Nana, 12/05/2009 10:50:17 AM
It is disturbing that Premier Bartlett is saying 'just build it' about the Gunns proposed mill when there is an independent legal expert saying the approval process is not valid. It puts the State at risk! Mr Stokes has nothing to gain and possibly will be vilified like others for drawing attention to the mill situation. The Premier should follow the precautionary principle and have a legal review considering the Stokes position. In that way Mr Bartlett will protect the State and ratepayers of Tasmania. If the process is invalid, the project must not proceed. Why would Mr Bartlett say such a stupid thing?
Posted by Judith King, 12/05/2009 11:10:13 AM
Com'on, there are always 100's of different ways to interpret legislation. This will go no where. The pulp mill should be built with all the support we can give it.
Posted by Marcus, 12/05/2009 12:58:06 PM
It is simple Judith. Bartlett is in election mode. He can shout 'jobs' until the cows come home. He would know that it is an empty promise that he can argue until election day. It is a populist argument similar to buying a used car, just don't look too close at the detail. I agree, Stokes, a revered law lecturer, has absolutely nothing to gain by this and has been silent while the 5 year mill issue has been debated. Bartlett and Gunns are tap dancing.
Posted by China, 12/05/2009 2:00:27 PM
Tap dancing - very in depth and intelligent response. Again I ask, where are you people on any other matter of concern for this area? We never hear a murmur. Tired of you self-centred one dimensional activists, all emotion NEVER any substance.
Posted by Wally the worker, 12/05/2009 3:32:18 PM
So we have Barletts' true colours showing! It seems to me that Labour has become a cancer to this state and one that needs to be cut out!!! I have never seen so many lies, deceit, and misinformation from a group of people that say they represent the people of Tasmania!!! Call a referendum Bartlett so we can put this disastrous decision to rest once and for all... "Sustainable industry" is the way to go and one that will have a positive impact on our economy and create long term Tasmanian jobs for the future, not a greedy one-eyed company continuously receiving handouts and favours to keep it afloat and laying off jobs, not creating them!!!
Posted by Henk of Launceston, 12/05/2009 4:08:16 PM
'You people?' Come on Wally! We live here and Gunns want to turn it into a toilet! There is a report that estimates that 2000 existing jobs could go if the mill is built.('Roundtable report'). Look at what Gunns and the CFMEU have offered. Imported workers from Austria, Finland and Sweden to assemble the mill. Canadians to operate it. South Africans, (already here), to work as Forestors. Not much in the way of local employment, unless you are selling pies for lunch.
Posted by China, 12/05/2009 4:28:23 PM
Like his 'old mate' Lennon, Bartlett wants to help Gunn's and its shareholders at the expense of the environment, the local communities, local business and jobs. So Wally, if Gunn's is such a great corporate citizen, and the 'jobs' aspect so important, why did Gunn's retrench the workers in Scottsdale and in the retail operation at Youngtown? More Contractors and direct Gunn's employees have lost jobs due to the mismanagement of the Gunn's board, than will ever be 'created' by the proposed mill. Whose Island? Ours or Gunns?
Posted by Bryan 'the worker', 12/05/2009 6:49:22 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Michael Stokes
Michael Stokes

Most popular articles

Stevenson Prestiges
1) Apple iPhone 4 32GB44 plans 12%
2) Apple iPhone 4 16GB44 plans 14%
3) Motorola Quench7 plans 3%
4) HTC Desire4 plans 1%
5) Apple iPhone 3GS 8GB33 plans 2%

Mobile Phones | Broadband Plans

Get the best deal at Fairfax Digital - Rural Press



Membership: login | join

The Examiner Newspaper







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Navigate

Classifieds

More Ways to Read

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2010. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...