News 
 Local News 
 News 
 Business 
 Investors in pipeline for Gunns pulp mill 

Investors in pipeline for Gunns pulp mill

19 Aug, 2010 08:21 AM
FORESTRY company Gunns Ltd has indicated it may be a step closer to securing the finance for its proposed $2billion Bell Bay pulp mill.

Three potential investors are now undertaking due diligence on the project, chief executive Greg L'Estrange said yesterday.

Mr L'Estrange would not make any further comment about the potential investors or the timeline for an announcement about the outcome.

"It's a detailed process and when we've finished that, we can update the market," he said.

"It's a long and involved process for an investment of this magnitude and complexity.

"We will be in business with this partner or partners for the long term, so it's important that it's done in a measured way rather than pushing it through."

Swedish paper and pulp company Sodra was originally tipped as a potential investor. However, it released a statement in June to say that any investment would need to use 100 per cent plantation forest, meet Forestry Stewardship Council standards and use environmentally friendly bleaching technology, preferably totally chlorine-free.

The proposed Bell Bay pulp mill will be elemental chlorine- free.

Mr L'Estrange said the mill would use 100 per cent plantation fibre and was progressing with international Forest Stewardship Council accreditation for its wood supply, in addition to its Australian Forest Standards national certification.

"It's not about certification so much as engaging with end users and stakeholders," he said. "We're looking for improvements and suggestions from a range of people, including those we have been in conflict with."

Mr L'Estrange said that work in respect of the maintenance of environmental permits was ongoing, and construction of the mill was ready to begin once financial backing was secured.

"The recent market for export woodchips has reinforced the merits of a sustainable, plantation-fed mill," he said.

"In a period where wood fibre value has remained static in real terms, pulp value has increased significantly with a strong outlook."

Gunns yesterday released its final results for financial year 2009-10, recording a net profit after tax of $28.5 million, an almost 50 per cent drop on the previous year's profit.

READ MORE North-East fears:

Page 13

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
For goodness sake, knock this dud project on the head once and for all and let us all get back to our lives in peace. You know you want to......nothing in this report suggests that Gunns is any closer to financing their stinkymill than they were six years ago. Let it go, Greg, let it go. Start building that bloody thing and all hell will break loose.
Posted by Valleywtcher, 19/08/2010 9:20:57 AM, on The Examiner
EFFECT ON THE CONFIDENCE OF TASMANIANS IN THEIR POLITICIANS - STATE AND ULTIMATELY FEDERAL. There is bigger picture stuff here! After what occurred with the RPDC, after the Lennon, Hornsey, Gay, Gray, Conns relationship, after the conflicting statements made by Gunns, after the passing of the Pulp Mill Assessment Act (and section 11) and the Labor/Liberal approval team, few Tasmanians have any confidence in the honesty of politicians, particularly Tasmanian ones. This lack of trust will undermine all current and future state and federal politicians and their decisions, (and ultimately all government departments - eg DIER obtaining land for Gunns to use the Dilston Bypass for its pipeline.) Our politicians must get this trust back and likewise for Gunns to gain Forest Stewardship Council accreditation, the proposed mill must be resubmitted to the RPDC for a full and complete assessment and the community must be listened to. Those politicians who make a stand will gain honour and respect and so will Gunns, (with all the goodies that that respect will bring.) The problem is, if politicians and Gunns don't trust honesty they have a problem. And, "Houston, WE have a problem."
Posted by Frank, 19/08/2010 9:43:45 AM, on The Examiner
This is not news. Gunns have been alleging they have investors lined up for years now, but nobody has been silly enough to commit to this poorly sited project. Only if an investor publically supports the proposed mill will there be any news to report.
Posted by Scott, 19/08/2010 10:13:51 AM, on The Examiner
Well, I hope any potential investors reading this are aware that howevever much Gunns might hope to achieve a social licence for the pulp mill, they have the proverbial snowball's chance in hell of ever doing so. This mill will NEVER be accepted in the Tamar Valley, and ANYONE who thinks otherwise is seriously delusional. The fight to stop it polluting the valley, and the lives of all who live here has been going for six long years, and it ain't going to stop until this massively inappropriate industrial dinosaur is totally and forever buried, never ever to be resurrected. The assessment for this pulp mill project has more holes in it than your average kitchen sieve. This mill is, to be blunt, a crock. I'd also suggest that Brown Brothers, who have just invested in Tamar Ridge vineyards, are of the same opinion. They wouldn't have spent millions buying them otherwise. The stench of pulp mill emissions would not improve the vintage one bit. That Mr L'Estrange is suddenly being trotted out to utter these reassuring messages suggests Gunns' increasing levels of desperation. Oh dear.
Posted by anne, 19/08/2010 1:18:34 PM, on The Examiner
So Gunns announces a $28.5 million profit. If John Gay stated in 2007 that having to wait on approval for the mill to commence would cost Gunns $1 miilion per day, I say they should be close to $1 billion in the red, or was John playing bleeding hearts?!
Posted by Damo, 19/08/2010 1:47:25 PM, on The Examiner
The dishonesty, the distrust, the lack of appreciation that the mill will have an impact on people who have a right to a voice, all mean that IF Gunns get finance, they and their new partner will still have a huge fight on their hands. I wonder if they realise that the government, while still supporting the project, may not be prepared to be quite so blatant about it now?
Posted by jose, 19/08/2010 4:25:49 PM, on The Examiner

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Greg L'Estrange
Greg L'Estrange

Most popular articles




The Examiner Newspaper







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...