News 
 Local News 
 News 
 Business 
 Gunns welcomes Burnie woodchip apology 

Gunns welcomes Burnie woodchip apology

09 Oct, 2009 03:35 PM
TIMBER company Gunns Limited has failed in its bid for damages against Hobart doctor Frank Nicklason over claims he made about legionella and fugal organisms in woodchip piles near Burnie, but it did get an apology.

The company had originally been seeking $250,000 in damages for defamation but the matter was settled at a directions hearing in the Victorian Supreme Court today.

Gunns chairman John Gay said in a media statement today that he welcomed the apology.

"In 2002 Dr Nicklason claimed in the media that the company's woodchip piles at the Burnie wharf would almost certainly have legionella and fungal organisms which can be blown across the town.

"Dr Nicklason today gave a written apology to the company for making the claims, as part of a settlement of a legal action brought against him by the company," the statement said.

Mr Gay said the apology should reassure Tasmanians following years of misinformation about health risks from woodchips.

Dr Nicklason said he had not agreed to pay any money to Gunns for damages or any of their legal cost but had agreed to send a letter to Gunns in relation to the comments.

Dr Nicklason said the letter he sent to Gunns apologised for making the statement in relation to health risks associated with the woodchip piles only because he accepted he should have approached the company with his concerns directly before going public.

"The public health concerns which motivated my action then, remain a concern for me," Dr Nicklason said.

"I fail to see how this can provide reassurance as Gunns seem to be claiming. This issue requires further investigation in my view. I also emphatically reject the implication that I was spreading misinformation," Dr Nicklason said.

Gunns said his apology states: "I apologise to Gunns for publishing that statement. I accept that Gunns has subsequently obtained independent expert reports which did not find legionella in samples from the stockpiles of woodchips in Burnie and concluded that there was no available data worldwide to implicate woodchips as a microbial health risk."

Dr Nicklason said in his media statement that Gunns had taken action against him in December, 2004, when he and 19 other people were sued in what has become know as the Gunns20 case.

Gunns had been seeking $250,000 in damages plus costs. The Victorian Supreme Court ordered the case to mediation in August.

Dr Nicklason is a staff general and geriatric specialist physician at the Royal Hobart Hospital.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Gunns shouldn’t boast about this as it is yet another case of litigation to silence criticism which is common practice where Gunns is concerned. It’s interesting that the manufacturers of potting mix which contains a lot of wood chips have a warning on every bag about the danger of inhaling from the mix. There are many documented cases of Legionella from potting mix so the chance of Legionella in woodchips is high and people need to be careful. I am an intensive care nurse and have nursed several patients with Legionnaires’ disease and the associated pneumonia and total body organ failure in some. The potting mix manufacturers have been responsible and managed public health risks by providing adequate warnings. It’s a shame Gunns can’t do the same. This is another example of Gunns bullying a highly reputable person to silence by keeping him in court for years.
Posted by Intensive care nurse, 9/10/2009 10:35:38 AM, on The Examiner
On the contrary, I can't say I'm reassured one bit given that this is Gunns we are talking about, whose reputation - both in litigious matters, and matters environmental, isn't exactly one that inspires confidence and trust. Certainly the comment posted by 'Intensive Care Nurse' in respect of potting mix gives plenty of food for thought. After all it doesn't take much to join the dots, and realise the likelihood of Legionella being in woodchip piles is highly probable, even if none was found in respect of one (small?) sample. I wonder how many subsequent samples were studied?
Posted by anne, 9/10/2009 11:32:38 AM, on The Examiner
A Tasmania Doctors concerns silenced. I believe what Dr Frank Nicklason had to say before the threat of litigation. Why is it a picture of John Gray makes me want to throw up.
Posted by Fluffy of the North, 9/10/2009 11:54:34 AM, on The Examiner
Thanks for this piece. Interesting. I would like to hear from Dr. Frank Nicklasson himself rather than hear Gunns version of events. How would anyone feel having the threat of a lawsuit hanging over their heads for years? If I were Frank I would probably say or do just about anything to take the pressure of me. How about the Examiner report a current comment by Dr. Frank rather than second hand comments via Gunns PR people? This article is all "Gunns says". Where is Dr. Franks voice? I'm sure there is a lot more to this than meets the eye. As for misinformation about Gunns..Huh! Imagine if private citizens had the financial resources to sue Gunns for every bit of misinformation that Gunns has published about its detractors. This is a pyrrhic victory for a large logging company that has successfully cowe larged sections of the Tasmanian public and media. There is nothing to brag about there John Gay. You know it and we know all know it. This episode will not improve Gunns poor image as a spoilt corporate bully one iota.
Posted by Johnno, 9/10/2009 1:29:13 PM, on The Examiner
When will you Greens learn? Gunns is not the bully here. It's the Greens who tell lies. Gunns employs more Tasmanians than any other company.
Posted by Jobs jobs jobs, 9/10/2009 2:43:43 PM, on The Examiner
John Gay surely you are now required under Workplace Health and Safety legislation to instigate a scientific study to see if there is any health risks from the woodchip piles. Your Company is quoted as saying that " there was no available data worldwide to implicate woodchips as a microbial health risk.” I gather that there is likewise no available data worldwide to exonerate woodchips as a microbial health risk.” A win for Gunns - I think not !
Posted by Hobart Harry, 9/10/2009 3:27:03 PM, on The Examiner
The message is simple. If you make unsubstantiated claims in the public arena that are deliberately designed to damage a public Company then you had better be prepared to suffer the consequences. Nicklason got what he deserved.
Posted by Frankly, 9/10/2009 3:56:55 PM, on The Examiner
It's not Greens that tell lies. It's Gunns, Forestry Tasmania, and the entire industry. Rotten to the core.
Posted by Anti Gunns, 9/10/2009 4:27:25 PM, on The Examiner
Wouldn't it be nice if we all agreed on something for a change. No wonder Tasmania is behind, more people are interested in the he said, she said, he did, she did game than moving forward. Let's start to think about what we can achieve as tasmanians working together instead of all these games that cost us money, and valuable time that can be spend making our future brighter for our kids.
Posted by Andrew, 9/10/2009 5:55:27 PM, on The Examiner
I'm sure we could all find instances of both sides telling lies over the years. That makes any chance of finding the truth over woodchip piles, pulp mills or anythng else relating to forestry virtually impossible.
Posted by Shaun, 9/10/2009 7:04:57 PM, on The Examiner
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
John Gay
John Gay

Most popular articles




The Examiner Newspaper







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...