News 
 Local News 
 News 
 Business 
 Gunns is accused of misleading statements 

Gunns is accused of misleading statements

07 Aug, 2009 02:03 PM
THE Tasmanian Greens have accused Gunns of misleading the public with a statement that it would start clearing land at Trevallyn and on a private East Tamar property for its pulp mill water pipeline.

Gunns has said it aims to start slashing work at the sites before the end of the month, following its start of slashing at the pulp mill site at Bell Bay on Monday.

Environmental Protection Authority director Warren Jones said Gunns had proposed, in the coming months, to undertake preparatory works.

They were:

•Slashing and mulching of understorey vegetation on the pulp mill site.

•Slashing of understorey vegetation and removal of trees from a two-kilometre stretch of the water pipeline route south of Hillwood (Likemans Hill)

•Slashing of understorey vegetation and removal of trees from a section of the water pipeline corridor on land within, but excised from, the Trevallyn Reserve and the establishment of a gravel base for a balance tank.

•Slashing of vegetation on the site of the workers accommodation facility at George Town.

Mr Jones said Gunns had satisfied all permit requirements to start the pulp mill site works.

It has started clearing a hectare a day of the 70-hectare pulp mill site footprint.

Mr Jones said a number of pre-requisites had not been satisfied for the the final three work plans.

"Although, Gunns has submitted documentation in relation to those which are currently being assessed," Mr Jones said.

A Gunns spokesman said the company would comply with all requirements and would not start work until it had secured all necessary permits.

But Greens pulp mill spokesman Kim Booth said it was misleading of the company to claim it was "all systems go" for major work to begin.

"This is a bit like John Gay mowing his lawn and claiming it's a start on the pulp mill," Mr Booth said.

"What is clear is that Gunns have no permission to start major works and the slashing of scrub at the mill site is a pathetic attempt to convince people that something is actually happening with regard to the project."

Gunns would yesterday not comment on its attempts to secure a commitment from its preferred joint venture partner for the $2.2 billion project.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
All documentation submitted? Bit by bit Gunns are ticking the boxes. Most people I talk to just want them to get on with it. Booth and his team of clowns in TAP just need to get over it.
Posted by Marty, 7/08/2009 8:23:13 AM, on The Examiner
Well Marty, that’s the people you know, the people you talk to. Maybe you should extend your world, met thinking people who can see beyond the destructive corporate greed smelly government past. Then maybe you will realise who the clowns are.
Posted by Fluffy of the North, 7/08/2009 12:10:07 PM, on The Examiner
This is the sort of outrageous comment that we expect from the greens, and shows why we need an ethics commission to monitor our politicians. The greens have failed to support this value adding project that uses world standards that have been judged clean and green by international authorities. They only seem interested in being negative.
Posted by kraft, 7/08/2009 1:57:30 PM, on The Examiner
Hi Marty, there's just one very minor detail in your plans for a pulp mill. Who is going to buy pulp thats twice the price of pulp already on the world market? It's exactly the same story at ACL Bearings. Just wishing a manufacturing sector is not enough to undo decades of Liberal and Labors failed globalisation policy.
Posted by Karl Stevens, 7/08/2009 2:13:06 PM, on The Examiner
Most people I talk to want Gunns to face reality and formally announce the abandonment of this farcical and fanciful proposed pulp mill. Kraft is correct in asserting that we need an ethics commission to monitor our politicians. The state government approval process meets third world governance standards. Any claims that this mill is built to current world's best practice or meets stringent standards is patently false. The Guns sham continues ...
Posted by Bert Norton, 7/08/2009 2:24:38 PM, on The Examiner
Gunns said this project would CREATE between 200 and 300 ongoing jobs - but since the mill idea was floated Gunns have terminated more jobs than that, including 100 from Auspine in 2008, 20-odd earlier in 2009 from one of their mills and a huge number of their Forestry Contractors (refer Ferdie Kroon's comments in the press last week). So Gunns should actually be saying that the mill might REPLACE SOME of the jobs that Gunns have axed in recent years. Or we could just wake up and stop propping up old industries with tax breaks (MIS), government grants, cheap access to timber (Forestry Tasmania loss in 2007-08 of over $38 million), etc, etc. Nah - that seems too sensible for some...
Posted by Tony, 7/08/2009 2:53:18 PM, on The Examiner
Please people...use your name to identify yourself...else do not waste our time. Buck Emberg
Posted by Buck and Joan Emberg, 7/08/2009 4:33:15 PM, on The Examiner
So we are ordered to give our names when commenting.Why so we can be attacked for a point of view.I note you give your name but no substantive comment Buck. The biggest problem here is that because both sides of the arguement have clouded the issue it is very hard to distinguish exactly where the smell is coming from, the pro or anti lobbys.The one fact that does stand out though is that the mill would be shut down if the anti lobby are right so what is the problem.Neither State nor Federal governments would allow it to continue regardless of current policies as it would simply be political suicide.
Posted by Wally the worker, 7/08/2009 5:13:43 PM, on The Examiner
Unless individuals are willing to submit their names and addresses, then why should not this exercise be see as just another exercise in spin by Gunn's Ltd and Forestry Tasmania, the latter being owned by this poor excuse for a Tasmanian Govt. Roll on the election day. Don Davey, Launceston


Posted by Don davey, 7/08/2009 5:30:35 PM, on The Examiner
The split in the Tasmanian community is painfully obvious from the comments on this page. If you believe in the principle of democracy that says the people's wishes are to be respected then put it to a referendum. Now. If the majority want it OK. If they don't, rather than giving more to Gunns, put the people's taxes and effort into using the University and two Tafe colleges to design inventive, innovative new products that produce skilled people, clean products and good export earnings for Tasmania. Also use the institutions and money to assist people with ideas to develop and market them. Neither side of the mill argument can argue with this. Or can they?
Posted by Frank, 7/08/2009 5:51:29 PM, on The Examiner
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Site clearing has started at the Gunns pulp mill site. Picture: WILL SWAN
Site clearing has started at the Gunns pulp mill site. Picture: WILL SWAN

Most popular articles




The Examiner Newspaper







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...