Opinion 
 Blogs 
 Blog with Claire 
 Possible disability no excuse for abortion 

Possible disability no excuse for abortion

THIRTY-TWO weeks.

I flicked through the pages of the little development book I've been keeping for my baby boy, who is now seven months old.

From the pregnancy test to today, this book holds the milestones, memories and musings.

At 32 weeks we had a fourth scan which confirmed that a small complication was no longer an issue and I would be able to go ahead with a natural birth, praise God.

I remember looking at the scan, thinking how big he looked. The little black-and-white image gave the impression of a kid smearing his face against a window, cheeks and nose and lips flattened.

We were told he weighed 1.8 kilograms _ a ``healthy'' weight _ and was kicking and squirming like he was fully cooked and ready to meet the outside world.

But he had eight weeks yet.

Thirty-two weeks was also when mum organised a baby shower with friends and family. It was a hot Saturday afternoon and we sat sipping punch in our summer dresses, the mums in the room sharing sage advice.

``Breast-feed if possible,'' Julie said.

``Make lots of noise around the house'' was Tania's advice, and nurse Lois declared ``Be wise, immunise!''

``Tell them you love them,'' Alie said.

``Create memories for your children,'' Fiona added, while Aileen suggested that bub be ``wrapped tightly with arms tucked in a bunny rug when sleeping.''

And Nan wound an arm around my shoulders and said: ``Relax at the

birth and relax around your baby _ they sense your stress.''

True, true and true. Morsels of wisdom that have proven invaluable.

It was all so real at 32 weeks.

And then I read of the termination of 32-week-old unborn twins in Melbourne last week.

Mum had been told by doctors that one of her twin boys had a congenital heart defect that ``would require years of operations if he survived at all''.

She made the decision to abort.

However, when the procedure was performed on Tuesday, the healthy twin was accidentally injected.

An emergency caesarean was performed before the other little boy was also terminated.

Did anyone else throw up in their mouth when they read that story?

Health Services Commissioner Beth Wilson was quoted regarding several investigations under way to prevent similar tragedies.

``It doesn't sound like it's some terrible systemic error; it just sounds like it's one of those ghastly mistakes that human beings sometimes make, unfortunately,'' she said.

A ghastly mistake that can only

happen when mere man steps into God's shoes.

The tragedy here is not in the medical slip-up so much as the mentality that it is OK to abort a 32-week-old child. Two 32-week-old boys, in fact.

Mum and dad probably agonised over the decision, but perhaps it's not a decision we should be permitted to make.

I have a friend whose little girl was born at 32 weeks and five days.

Maddy is a beautiful, if not boisterous, two-year-old and her parents' hearts burst with pride and love every time they see her.

You can see it written all over their faces.

Yet here is another baby of the same age being given the lethal injection, within the bounds of Australian law.

Do you see the paradox?

This is the ultimate discrimination: babies dying due to disability _ a heart defect, the chance of Down syndrome and so on.

Is anyone else angry? Let's make an awful accident a catalyst for change.

Lobby your pollies, rally friends, start a petition or something. The law is just simply wrong on this matter.

I'm reminded of a verse in 1 Peter 2:16, ``Live as free men, but do not use your freedom as a cover-up for evil.''

Please, stop killing our babies.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I think this type of situation should be a choice for the mother and nothing to do with anybody else and their opinions.
Posted by Deeply suspicious, 28/11/2011 9:59:50 AM, on The Examiner
Fundamentalist Christian rants like this have no place in a newspaper especially one from a secular nation like Australia.
Posted by Chris Maltisanti, 28/11/2011 10:28:50 AM, on The Examiner
I respect your right to hold religious beliefs and to share them online. But I sincerely hope you fail in your quest to force your beliefs onto other Australian women.
Posted by Dave, 28/11/2011 10:44:03 AM, on The Examiner
It is entirely the parents choice !! If Mr. God had wanted to, He could have made the baby well. I have watched the lives of my dear friends who have a severely disabled daughter grind by. They are 40 years old. Their daughter is now 18. She cannot do anything for herself, has never written a single word, drawn a picture or had a lucky break. Drooling, screaming, endless medical procedures and PAIN are her life. But it is her parents that show the stress. They look much older than they should. Barely a day ever. Their days are spent battling bureaucracy, and the reality of 18 years of nappies.
Posted by Neil, 28/11/2011 11:02:41 AM, on The Examiner
I find this article completely disgusting and offensive. If you are going to quote from a bible, at least read the whole thing. No one who reads that garbage would ever willingly quote from it.

I am seriously angry from reading this. This article needs to be removed to at attempt to recover some self dignity.

Disgusting.

Posted by Trin, 28/11/2011 12:49:27 PM, on The Examiner
Tragic all round - for doctors and parents and babies.

The parents have to have the choice - don't load up more guilt saying what they chose was "wrong" and against God.

Having a disabled child is very difficult and as parents age they have the added worry of finding good care for the child after they die .

Posted by seabird, 28/11/2011 1:35:01 PM, on The Examiner
There is no place for this sort of nonsense in a mainstream newspaper - it's about time The Examiner found a more sensible columnist.
Posted by Shane, 28/11/2011 1:42:11 PM, on The Examiner
Claire - I understand you have religious views on this issue. But I wonder: did you actually consult with the family before you chose to use their tragedy as part of a public platform to push your personal beliefs? Did you give any consideration to the feelings of the people who have suffered and lost here?

Honestly?

I wish there was some meaningful way to censure both you, and this newspaper, for the cynical way you've taken advantage of this family's unthinkable tragedy.

Posted by Thinker, 28/11/2011 2:23:55 PM, on The Examiner
I don't believe an article like this should have made it through editorial selection- the decision to terminate a pregnancy is not one that most people would take lightly, and those who do would be tortured enough already without religious rants and associated judgement from those from different circumstances. From conception to humanity is a process, there is no point at which a foetus is suddenly a child. Back off Claire- your God is yours, not mine.
Posted by Mountain Dragon, 28/11/2011 3:53:53 PM, on The Examiner
I've just read the article, and then the comments. There are only a few, but I've been stunned by the venom. Faith (of any kind) is not the only determinant of whether aborting a child at 32 weeks is wrong or not. Children are born at 32 weeks and survive. Children with heart problems may also survive normal birth at normal gestation - sometimes they do require surgery as did our friends' son. (He had multiple surgeries, but is now a happy, healthy 27 years old). Sadly, this was a completely preventable tragedy. And I wonder at the advice provided to the parents. My heart breaks for them.
Posted by Cyclonic, 28/11/2011 4:00:22 PM, on The Examiner
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10  |  next >
Claire van Ryn's column KEEPING THE FAITH appears in The Examiner every Monday. You can blog with Claire from 10am every Tuesday

Most popular articles




The Examiner Newspaper







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...